GB1565921A – Process for fermentation of green fodder
– Google Patents
GB1565921A – Process for fermentation of green fodder
– Google Patents
Process for fermentation of green fodder
Download PDF
Info
Publication number
GB1565921A
GB1565921A
GB5087/78A
GB508778A
GB1565921A
GB 1565921 A
GB1565921 A
GB 1565921A
GB 5087/78 A
GB5087/78 A
GB 5087/78A
GB 508778 A
GB508778 A
GB 508778A
GB 1565921 A
GB1565921 A
GB 1565921A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
fodder
lactic acid
green
green fodder
fermentation
Prior art date
1977-02-16
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
GB5087/78A
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Medipharm AB
Original Assignee
Medipharm AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
1977-02-16
Filing date
1978-02-08
Publication date
1980-04-23
1978-02-08
Application filed by Medipharm AB
filed
Critical
Medipharm AB
1980-04-23
Publication of GB1565921A
publication
Critical
patent/GB1565921A/en
Status
Expired
legal-status
Critical
Current
Links
Espacenet
Global Dossier
Discuss
Classifications
C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
C12P1/00—Preparation of compounds or compositions, not provided for in groups C12P3/00 – C12P39/00, by using microorganisms or enzymes
C12P1/04—Preparation of compounds or compositions, not provided for in groups C12P3/00 – C12P39/00, by using microorganisms or enzymes by using bacteria
A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
A23K—FODDER
A23K30/00—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs
A23K30/10—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder
A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
A23K—FODDER
A23K30/00—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs
A23K30/10—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder
A23K30/15—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder using chemicals or microorganisms for ensilaging
A23K30/18—Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder using chemicals or microorganisms for ensilaging using microorganisms or enzymes
C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
C12N1/20—Bacteria; Culture media therefor
C12N1/205—Bacterial isolates
C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
C12R—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES C12C – C12Q, RELATING TO MICROORGANISMS
C12R2001/00—Microorganisms ; Processes using microorganisms
C12R2001/01—Bacteria or Actinomycetales ; using bacteria or Actinomycetales
C12R2001/46—Streptococcus ; Enterococcus; Lactococcus
Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
Y10S426/00—Food or edible material: processes, compositions, and products
Y10S426/807—Poultry or ruminant feed
Description
PATENT SPECIFICATION
( 11) 1 565 921 ( 21) ( 31) ( 32) ( 33) ( 44) ( 51) Application No 5087/78 ( 22) Filed 8 Feb 1978 Convention Application No 7701687 Filed 16 Feb 1977 in Sweden (SE)
Complete Specification published 23 April 1980
INT CL 3 A 23 K 3/02 ( 52) Index at acceptance A 2 B 340 421 632 637 643 721 ECB ( 54) A PROCESS FOR FERMENTATION OF GREEN FODDER ( 71) We, AB MEDIPHARM, a Swedish Company, of Box 4114, 262 04 Angelholm, Sweden, do hereby declare the invention for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement:-
This invention relates to a process for the manufacture of pressed fodder controlled by lactic acid fermentation and is especially intended for a process for fermentation of green fodder in a silo or similar chamber or vessel in order to preserve it The expression «green fodder» as used herein means green plants or plant parts such as root crops tops, after crop or pasture grass, and «pressed fodder» means such green fodder that has been pressed together in a silo or similar chamber or vessel, usually by its own weight.
It is known that preservation of green fodder can be made by sourmaking.
Sourmaking can be made either by so called self-fermentation or the addition of a suitable acid The acid preserved green fodder can be used for the feed especially of cattle.
It is also known that sourmaking can be made in two different ways According to one, the green fodder is collected in silos or similar chambers or vessels, where selffermentation can take place during generation of inter alia lactic acid In fermentation there are also often formed non-desirable break-down-products such as butyric acid These non-desirable byproducts deteriorate the quality of the pressed fodder to a high extent Another disadvantage in self-fermentation is the fact that the protein-value of the pressed fodder often decreases, in general up to 70 % These disadvantages result in heavy losses in the production of cattle and milk The selffermentation-method is in general very uncertain and often leads to a total putrefaction of the green fodder especially due to influence of temperature Said method is now used very seldom.
The most common method when manufacturing pressed fodder is to collect the green fodder in a silo or similar chamber or vessel and feed to it acid i e hydrochloric acid or a mixture of different acids Besides mineral acids, also organic acids such as formic and propionic acid can be used The p H value in the green fodder treated in this way is low, such that putrefaction bacteria cannot be developed At the same time it is possible substantially completely to preserve the nutritional quality of the fodder Before using the sour made green fodder, the so called sour-fodder, the acid or acids are often neutralized by a suitable base, i e lime The disadvantage of this type of treatment is that expensive substances having small or no nutritional content at all are used and the handling of corrosive acids is inconvenient.
According to the present invention the above mentioned disadvantages are removed by a process of fermentation of green fodder as hereinbefore defined, comprising the following steps, placing the said green fodder in a container, adding to the said green fodder a bacterial suspension in water comprising a culture of bacteria organism producing lactic acid, said organism belonging to streptococcus and having an initial concentration of at least 15,000 living cells per gramme of green fodder, fermenting said green fodder in the presence of a nitrogen source and a source of carbohydrates in the temperature range C to 381 C under pressure to produce in pressed fodder as hereinbefore defined, a final concentration of lactic acid of at least 2 % by weight.
Clearly the material must not contain such substances that restrain the growth of the bacteria and thereby restrain the lactic acid production, for example antibiotics, heavy metal salts or chemicals toxic for bacteria In the industrial production of lactic acid, pure lactic acid as well as in the 1,565,921 manufacture of different dairy products and other fermented provisions organisms belonging to the family Lactobacillaceae are often used In that connection different types of lactobacillus and kinds of streptococcus included in the so called lactic acid group are most used.
In the present invention organisms belonging to the group Enterococcus and specially Streptococcus faecium are used for the production of lactic acid The Bergeys Manual from 1957 does not state Str.
faecium as an independent strain Later literature separates the group DStreptococcus, the so called Enterococcus in such a way that Str _faecium is included as an independent type Further it is stated that the type consists of a number of strains which can differ from each other regarding simple biochemical and immunological qualities Simplified, this means that Str.
faecium is a middle group between Str.
durans and Str faecalis Especially the differences from Str faecalis are important:
Strains from faecium require folic acid as an essential growth factor which is not the case with faecalis.
Strains from Str faecium have been isolated from the intestinal flora of human beings, pig, cattle, sheep and poultry Str.
faecium belongs to the natural intestinal flora in these organisms.
The Str faecium organisms are homofermentative, i e only producing lactic acid when breaking down utilizable carbohydrates Types that do not produce soluble hemolysines are regarded as completely apatogenic, and higher organisms’ tolerance against high percentage of Str faecium is very good No serious negative effects are known in peroral supply of these.
Str faecium can use most of the mono and disaccarides as a carbon source Then 2 moles lactic acid are made of 1 mole monosaccarides (Glucose) Final value of p H in non-buffered cultures is between 3 6 and 4 0.
In treating green fodder to produce sourfodder fermentatively, the most suitable way to lead the process could be to use types belonging to Lactobacillus It is known that different types of Lactobacillus can be used to stabilize the intestinal flora in domestic animals It would consequently be natural to utilize Lactobacillus for the production of lactic acid and by that getting several advantages at the same time, viz:
preservation of the fodder and a delivery of Lactobacillus with the ensilage to the animals Such a delivery of different so called lactogenic organisms (Lactobacillus and Streptococcus) in preventive or therapeutical purpose is in general called lactobacillus-therapy.
It is known that organisms used in lactobacillus-therapy by production of lactic acid can prevent or decrease the growth of micro-organisms, which commonly are called proteolytic Such organisms are responsible for the putrefaction in nature while others are pathogenic if they are allowed to grow in the intestinal channel.
In the same way as the composition of the intestinal flora can be influenced by supporting the growth of the lactogenic bacteria, the growth of such organisms on for instance the treatment of green fodder can prevent and break respectively the growth and metabolism of proteolytic organisms The first reason for the antagonistical effect seems to be the ability of the lactogenes to produce lactic acid As an example of the selective rate of lactic acid environment is the fact that there has been measured an average value for p H of 5.1 in a lactobacillus-dominant intestinal microflora, while in a so-called colidominant intestinal flora the corresponding value of p H 5 1 was 6 5 At the same time coliformic bacteria and enterococcus have been able to grow while in the former case only lactobacillus In the so called colidominant intestinal flora there has also been found type of Clostridium, Bacteroides, Proteus and Pseudomonas Several of these types are so called proteolytic and pathogenic The relations are similar in most of the biological materials having a spontaneous non-controlled fermentation.
One way to prevent a non-controlled fermentation of pressed fodder should be to supply a relevant quantity of a suitable strain of lactobacillus at which time also the specific demands regarding nutrition supply and temperature for a rapid lactic acid production should be assured Practical tests have, however, shown that it is difficult to achieve at a lactic acid production high enough with justifiable quantities of some lactobacillus type, i e Lacidophylus The reason for this seems to be the long generation time of the lactobacillus, i e the slow growth speed.
It has been mentioned above that the concentration of lactic acid in a fermented product is of essential importance to the preservation Consequently, there is a quantitative connection between ability to make preservation effect and the ability to product lactic acid in lactogenic organisms.
There seems to be no significant differences between the different lactogenic organisms.
It has been found necessary that the lactic acid concentration has to reach a certain threshold value to prevent growth of nondesirable micro-organisms From that appears that when treating the pressed fodder with lactic acid producing bacterias the result is to a very high extent influenced J,6,2 by how quick the threshold value of the lactic acid concentration is reached During too slow growth and too slow lactic acid production the putrefaction can reach such proportions by the growth of proteolytic micro-organisms that the result will be unacceptable even if further growth of these growth of these organisms successively is stopped.
According to a preferred embodiment of the process of the invention a culture of a lactic acid producing bacteria organisms belonging to streptococcus having a generation time (half-life) of thirty minutes at the highest is used homo-fermentatively.
This gives the advantage that the above mentioned threshold value can be reached quickly, and also that only lactic acid is produced.
In connection with the present invention we have found that the type Streptococcus faecium is specially suitable for a rapid lactic acid production and by that the threshold value of the lactic acid concentration can quickly be reached when treating the green fodder to produce pressed fodder (ensilage).
Besides the ability to produce by a p Hdecrease lactic acid having a viostatic effect, Str faecium is able to produce also soluble metabolite which direct or indirectly has a bacteriostatic/bacteriocidal effect.
By examinations we have found a cellfree medium from Str faecium cultures has a strong anti-E-coli-activity (bacteriostatic effect) Furthermore we have found that several other strains of lactogenic Streptococcus and Lactobacillus which produce quantatively comparable quantities of lactic acid are missing anti-E-coli-activity in cellfree medium The explanation of the bacteriological effect of the cellfree medium could either be the fact that the medium contains some bacteriostatic/bacteriocidal substances such as 2-deoxi-D-glucose, or the fact that Str.
faecium produces a substance which functions as an activator of the so called lactoperoxidase system i e hydrogen peroxide.
This principle works in such a way that the hydrogen peroxide which is produced in small quantities of several bacteria types activates lactoperoxidas which is in the most bacteriological materials Lactoperoxidas transforms in its turn SCN-ions, which are to be found commonly in biological material to an intermediar which is strongly bactericidal.
Apart from which bacteriological principle that is applicable to cellfree medium from Str faecium culture, it can be said that the preservation effect when treating the pressed fodder with a culture of Str faecium will be reached partly by a quick production of lactic acid and partly through the direct or indirect bacteriostatical effect of some metabolate produced by Str faecium.
For a description of Str faecium a reference is made to the following 70 literature:
Barnes M E «Journal of Applied Bacteriology», 27 ( 3) ( 1964) p 461 and Whittenbury R: «The Journal of General Microbiology», 38 ( 1965), p 279 75 The conditions for growth of Str faecium in green fodder and by that a relevant production of lactic acid are the following:1 Supply of essential growth factors such 80 as vitamines and micro-elements and some suitable nitrogen-source.
2 Carbo-hydrates, possible to break down by fermentation.
3 Suitable temperature 85 4 Suitable moisture.
During the treatment there is supplied to the green fodder a culture of Str flaecium to such an extent that an initial concentration of bacteria of at least 15,000 living cells per 90 gram fodder is reached The bacteria produce lactic acid by using available carbo-hydrates which are obtained from the cell sap The ratio between carbo-hydrates and produced lactic acid is theoretically 1: 1, 95 in other words from one gram carbohydrates one gram lactic acid can be produced In practice this ratio is approximately 1:0 8 i e an exchange of lactic acid which is approximately 20 % 100 below the theoretical one.
Nutritive substances are in general sufficient for a relevant growth of bacteria which produce lactic acid These are mostly mineral substances and nitrogenous 105 compounds that can be used as a nitrogensource These substances can be recovered in the cell sap, as well as some vitamines which are also necessary for the growth.
The condition for utilization of these 110 substances is, however, that the substances dissolved in the cell sap are pressed out so that a liquid medium is received.
To be able to reach an acceptable preservation effect the final concentration 115 of lactic acid in the pressed fodder must be at least 2 , The p H value for the ensilage containing approximately 2 5 % lactic acid is about 3 5-4 0 This acidity is commonly enough for preventing a non-desirable type 120 of bacteria fermentation.
The fermentation provides that the pressed fodder is kept at a suitable temperature i e at least 50 C and not exceeding 380 C Since the lactic acid 125 production in fermentation with Str faeciurn is an exothermic process and maintaining a suitable fermentation temperature is no problem In our experience a higher fermentation temperature will also support 130 1,565,921 A 1,565,921 the growth of proteolytical organisms when fermented with i e Lactobacillus as the production of lactic acid is a slow process.
When fermented with Str faecium the production of lactic acid happens very quickly It is true that the temperature of the pressed fodder is raised faster than in the former case, but this does not mean any inconvenience, since lactic acid at the same time is created to such an extent that nondesirable fermentations are effectively inhibited At temperatures exceeding 300 C the fermentation process is ready after five to eight hours.
The process of the present invention is exemplified below:Example:
One hundred kg of green fodder (beet tops or similar) was sprayed with a bacteria suspension made by dissolving a preparation consisting of a freeze dried culture of Str.
faecium, carbo-hydrates, vitamines, riboflavine, calcium pantothenate, folic acid, niacine and whey powder.
The quantity of living cells of Str faecium in the bacteria suspension was adjusted to be approximately 20 x 103 cells per gram of fodder The fodder was thereafter exposed to pressure in order to press out the cell sap.
The temperature was about 150 C The fermentation was completed and the concentration of lactic acid about 3 % after about eight days.
Although the process according to the invention now has been illustrated with references to streptocococcus Str faecium those skilled in the art will realise that any bacteria organism producing lactic acid belonging to streptococcus can be used with the same satisfactory result.
Claims (1)
WHAT WE CLAIM IS:-
fodder as hereinbefore defined, comprising the following steps, placing the said green fodder in a container, adding to the said green fodder a bacterial suspension in water comprising a culture of bacteria organism producing lactic acid, said organism belonging to streptococcus and having an initial concentration of at least 15,000 living cells per gram of green fodder, fermenting said green fodder in the presence of a nitrogen-source and a source of carbohydrates in the temperature range 5 o C to 380 C under pressure to produce in pressed fodder as hereinbefore defined, a final concentration of lactic acid of at least 2 % by weight.
2 The process according to claim 1, wherein the fermentation is made until a p H value of 3 5 to 4 0 is achieved.
3 The process according to claim I or claim 2, wherein the culture supplied to the green fodder has a maximum generation time of thirty minutes and is homo-fermentative.
4 The process according to any one of claims I to 3, wherein the green fodder is supplied to a suspension of a culture of Streptococcus faecium.
The process according to one of the preceding claims, wherein the nitrogen source is derived from a whey powder.
6 Pressed fodder whenever prepared by the process as claimed in any preceding claim.
7 A process for producing pressed fodder substantially as hereinbefore described with particular reference to the example.
For the Applicants, F J CLEVELAND & COMPANY, Chartered Patent Agents, 40/43 Chancery Lane, London, W C 2.
1 A process of fermentation of green Printed for Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, by the Courier Press, Leamington Spa, 1980 Published by The Patent Office, 25 Southampton Buildings London, WC 2 A l AY from which copies may be obtained.
GB5087/78A
1977-02-16
1978-02-08
Process for fermentation of green fodder
Expired
GB1565921A
(en)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number
Priority Date
Filing Date
Title
SE7701687A
SE411829B
(en)
1977-02-16
1977-02-16
PROCEDURE FOR THE DISPOSAL OF GRONFORDS
Publications (1)
Publication Number
Publication Date
GB1565921A
true
GB1565921A
(en)
1980-04-23
Family
ID=20330463
Family Applications (1)
Application Number
Title
Priority Date
Filing Date
GB5087/78A
Expired
GB1565921A
(en)
1977-02-16
1978-02-08
Process for fermentation of green fodder
Country Status (10)
Country
Link
US
(1)
US4210673A
(en)
AT
(1)
AT357412B
(en)
CA
(1)
CA1098364A
(en)
CH
(1)
CH633944A5
(en)
DE
(1)
DE2803794A1
(en)
DK
(1)
DK147313C
(en)
FR
(1)
FR2380741A1
(en)
GB
(1)
GB1565921A
(en)
IT
(1)
IT1161437B
(en)
SE
(1)
SE411829B
(en)
Cited By (1)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title
GB2159388A
(en)
*
1984-06-01
1985-12-04
Pan Britannica Ind Ltd
Preservation of silage
Families Citing this family (6)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title
US4349570A
(en)
*
1980-02-12
1982-09-14
Groupement D’interet Economique Valpron
Process of treating the juice of squeezed vegetable material, such as lucerne, for producing alimentary proteins and super-nitrogenated protein foods, and products obtained by said process
AT383956B
(en)
*
1985-10-11
1987-09-10
Mirimi Erzeugungs Handels Und
USE OF A NEW STREPTOCOCCUS FAECIUM BACTERIA TO REDUCE THE PH VALUE IN ANIMAL GASTRIC WAY OF ANIMALS, AND THE NEW STEM ITSELF
US4743454A
(en)
*
1986-07-28
1988-05-10
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.
Hay preservative
FR2615361B1
(en)
*
1987-05-21
1991-05-17
Union Champenoise Coop Deshydr
METHOD FOR SILAGE OF GREEN FORMS AFTER HOT PRESSING AND ITS INTEGRATION IN A DEHYDRATION PROCESS
EP0405569A1
(en)
*
1989-06-30
1991-01-02
Cernitin S.A.
Product with antimicrobial activity, its process of isolation from the culture brew containing streptococcus faecium and the pharmaceutical preparation containing this product with antimicrobial activity
DE102020133678A1
(en)
2020-12-16
2022-06-23
Thomas Schurig
Method of making animal feed
Family Cites Families (14)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title
FR958848A
(en)
*
1950-03-21
BE418895A
(en)
*
US1257754A
(en)
*
1917-12-19
1918-02-26
Carl Reinhardt
Process for preserving green fodder in the form of sweet green fodder.
US2299745A
(en)
*
1938-10-12
1942-10-27
Maelkeriet Enigheden As
Preservation of fodder
GB575262A
(en)
*
1943-11-08
1946-02-11
Joseph Arthur Jessop
Improvements in or relating to the production of ensilage and of adjuvants therefor
DE870056C
(en)
*
1946-02-19
1953-03-09
Fritz-Guenther Dr Keitel
Process for the preservation of plant material, in particular for the ensiling of green fodder, using lactic acid-producing bacteria
US2890956A
(en)
*
1955-07-26
1959-06-16
Bonda S Veevoederbureau N V
Methods and apparatus for pretreating green fodder
DE1245271B
(en)
*
1962-02-22
1967-07-20
Kaken Kagaku Kk
Process to accelerate the fermentation of green feed masses
FR1350241A
(en)
*
1963-02-18
1964-01-24
Kaken Kagaku Kk
Process for the maturation of silage products
FR1534166A
(en)
*
1966-08-11
1968-07-26
Fuu Ag
Dry silage agents and method of making them
US3459554A
(en)
*
1967-01-26
1969-08-05
Kaken Kagaku Kk
Process for ripening silages
DE1940513A1
(en)
*
1968-09-05
1970-09-03
Alfa Laval Ab
Process for green fodder conservation
US3677897A
(en)
*
1970-08-31
1972-07-18
George A Jeffreys
Live lactic acid bacteria cultures and process of producing same
SE396275B
(en)
*
1976-01-12
1977-09-19
Nilsson Nils Ragnar
PROCEDURE FOR BIOLOGICAL ENSILATION OF VEGETABLE AND / OR ANIMAL MATERIALS
1977
1977-02-16
SE
SE7701687A
patent/SE411829B/en
unknown
1978
1978-01-28
DE
DE19782803794
patent/DE2803794A1/en
not_active
Withdrawn
1978-02-06
IT
IT12461/78A
patent/IT1161437B/en
active
1978-02-08
GB
GB5087/78A
patent/GB1565921A/en
not_active
Expired
1978-02-14
FR
FR7804122A
patent/FR2380741A1/en
active
Granted
1978-02-15
CA
CA296,890A
patent/CA1098364A/en
not_active
Expired
1978-02-15
CH
CH168178A
patent/CH633944A5/en
not_active
IP Right Cessation
1978-02-15
DK
DK67678A
patent/DK147313C/en
not_active
IP Right Cessation
1978-02-15
US
US05/877,983
patent/US4210673A/en
not_active
Expired – Lifetime
1978-02-16
AT
AT113478A
patent/AT357412B/en
not_active
IP Right Cessation
Cited By (1)
* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title
GB2159388A
(en)
*
1984-06-01
1985-12-04
Pan Britannica Ind Ltd
Preservation of silage
Also Published As
Publication number
Publication date
IT1161437B
(en)
1987-03-18
DK147313C
(en)
1984-12-10
DE2803794A1
(en)
1978-08-17
SE7701687L
(en)
1978-08-16
CH633944A5
(en)
1983-01-14
IT7812461D0
(en)
1978-02-06
DK67678A
(en)
1978-08-17
ATA113478A
(en)
1979-11-15
US4210673A
(en)
1980-07-01
DK147313B
(en)
1984-06-18
FR2380741A1
(en)
1978-09-15
FR2380741B1
(en)
1984-04-20
SE411829B
(en)
1980-02-11
CA1098364A
(en)
1981-03-31
AT357412B
(en)
1980-07-10
Similar Documents
Publication
Publication Date
Title
Gibson et al.
1958
Bacteriological changes in silage made at controlled temperatures
US6025187A
(en)
2000-02-15
Combinations of bacillus and lactobacillus species for producing protein from waste
US4292331A
(en)
1981-09-29
Process and composition for the preservation of vegetables
MXPA97008793A
(en)
1998-02-01
Bacterial treatment for ensil
US4264448A
(en)
1981-04-28
Method for bacteriological treatment of manure and high bod industrial wastes
CN101735964A
(en)
2010-06-16
Microbial inoculum for preparing feed and application thereof
MOON et al.
1980
Aerobic deterioration of wheat, lucerne and maize silages prepared with Lactobacillus acidophilus and a Candida spp.
Merry et al.
1995
Use of freshly cultured lactic acid bacteria as silage inoculants
CA1214412A
(en)
1986-11-25
Silage production from fermentable forages
HU207206B
(en)
1993-03-29
Method for preserving fodder
CN101584378B
(en)
2011-12-14
Method for producing high protein feed by using sweet sorghum straw as raw material
US4210673A
(en)
1980-07-01
Process for fermentation of green fodder
US6905716B2
(en)
2005-06-14
Propionic acid based preservative agent for animal and vegetable products
McDonald
1982
Silage fermentation
CN101225364A
(en)
2008-07-23
Discovery of forage grass attached lactobacillus plantarum and enterococcus mundtii and use thereof
US2766176A
(en)
1956-10-09
Process for culturing anaerobic bacteria
CN105076900A
(en)
2015-11-25
Fermentation method of cassava starch residues
EP0063438A1
(en)
1982-10-27
Production of powder containing bacteria and product thereof
Ashbell et al.
1987
Chemical and microbiological changes occurring in orange peels and in the seepage during ensiling
JPS5913175B2
(en)
1984-03-28
Silage manufacturing method
AU7513496A
(en)
1996-12-18
Bacterial treatment to preserve silage
Senez et al.
1983
Protein enrichment of starchy substrates by solid-state fermentation
US4975373A
(en)
1990-12-04
Process for the preparation of sulphur-containing hydrocarbon chains
CA1095317A
(en)
1981-02-10
Process for biological ensiling of vegetable and/or animal materials
HU177440B
(en)
1981-10-28
Process for the ensilage of feed starting materilas
Legal Events
Date
Code
Title
Description
1980-07-09
PS
Patent sealed [section 19, patents act 1949]
1985-10-02
PCNP
Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee
