AU530127B2 - Creation of Inventions and Patents with Artificial Intelligence

AU530127B2 – Projection screen
– Google Patents

AU530127B2 – Projection screen
– Google Patents
Projection screen

Info

Publication number
AU530127B2

AU530127B2
AU63371/80A
AU6337180A
AU530127B2
AU 530127 B2
AU530127 B2
AU 530127B2
AU 63371/80 A
AU63371/80 A
AU 63371/80A
AU 6337180 A
AU6337180 A
AU 6337180A
AU 530127 B2
AU530127 B2
AU 530127B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
recesses
sheeting
projections
film
back surface
Prior art date
1979-09-05
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)

Ceased

Application number
AU63371/80A
Other versions

AU6337180A
(en

Inventor
Thomas Ian Bradshaw
Philip V. Palmquist
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)

3M Co

Original Assignee
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
1979-09-05
Filing date
1980-07-30
Publication date
1983-06-30

1979-09-05
Priority claimed from US06/072,661
external-priority
patent/US4268118A/en

1980-07-30
Application filed by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co
filed
Critical
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co

1981-03-31
Publication of AU6337180A
publication
Critical
patent/AU6337180A/en

1983-06-30
Application granted
granted
Critical

1983-06-30
Publication of AU530127B2
publication
Critical
patent/AU530127B2/en

2000-07-30
Anticipated expiration
legal-status
Critical

Status
Ceased
legal-status
Critical
Current

Links

Espacenet

Global Dossier

Discuss

Description

Description
Sheeting Useful as a Projection Screen
Technical Field
The present invention is directed to projection screens, particularly for projection television, and to sheet material for making such screens. A major goal in the projection television industry, is to increase the brightness, contrast, uniformity at different viewing po¬ sitions, and other aspects of the projected television image as it is viewed on a projection screen. This goal has prompted many research efforts, both in projection equipment and projection screens; but despite these efforts, signifi¬ cant improvement has still been needed before broad and satisfying use of projection television could be expected.
Background Art
At present, the screens most widely used for pro¬ jection television are made from sheeting described in Chandler et al, U.S. Pat. 3,408,132, which comprises alumi¬ num foil having a wrinkled surface prepared by compression rolling two sheets of the foil together under high pressure. This sheeting offers improvement in brightness of image over prior commercial beaded or lenticular projection screens, but it has a number of significant disadvantages — a) an extreme susceptibility to damage, such that even a slight rubbing of the screen to clean it deforms the wrinkled metal surface and leaves a lasting blemish (some reduction of this problem has recently been achieved with oxide coatings applied to the metal foil surface) ; b) a level of reflection that is too low to permit satisfactory viewing in lighted environments, such as a normally daylit-room; and c) limita¬ tions in the angular range of reflection from the screen (because of such limitations in angular range, the wrinkled-

foil screens are given a compound (horizontal and vertical) curvature to condense or aim the reflections at an audienc this compound curvature is achieved by adhesively mounting the sheeting on compound-curved substrates, which is an expensive, mistake-prone procedure; and even with the compound-curved screen the images projected by multi-tube color projection televisions, which typically comprise thr side-by-side projection tubes each projecting a different color, take on a different hue or tint depending on the horizontal displacement of a viewer from the central pro¬ jection axis) .
Screens taught in Sσhudel, U.S. Pat. 4,089,587, were developed in response to some of the deficiencies of wrinkled-foil screens. The Schudel screens comprise a transparent polymeric film formed with minute vertical striations in one surface, a random matte texture in that or an opposite surface, and a layer of reflective material such as vapor-deposited aluminum on one of the surfaces. The film is adhered to a substrate, preferably with the metallized surface adhered against the substrate to provide durability.
The Schudel screens provide a very bright image to viewers who are close to the projection axis, and can be much more durable than the wrinkled-foil screens. Never- theless, they have found only a limited acceptance, pri¬ marily because of the limited angular range of reflection from the screens. Outside a range of about plus-or-minus 5 degrees of the projection axis, the brightness of the image declines very rapidly. A different approach not yet brought to commercia use is described in German Pat. 2,655,527. This approach relies on an oriented film of foamed polypropylene, such as described in Bottomley, U.S. Pat. 3,214,234. The orienta¬ tion or stretching process leaves the exterior surface of the film densely packed with a random pattern of generally parallel elongated microscopic projections or recesses. Th

German patent teaches that when this surface is metallized, i.e., provided with a specularly reflective coating of vapor-deposited metal, it may be used as a projection screen for projection television and the like. The patent also suggests that a foamed film may be used as a master, for example, by forming a metal copy of the surface and using the metal copy to stamp the foamed surface into a plastic film, which itself can then be stretched and metallized. We have tested metallized oriented foamed poly- propylene projection screens as described in the German patent and find that they have good brightness; but there is an undesirable variation in brightness as a viewer moves from a position directly behind the projector. For example, by our measurements, such screens have a gain factor of 39 at a 0° divergence angle, but the gain factor is only 2*9, or 67 percent of its 0° value, at a horizontal divergence angle of 10° (footnotes are at the end of the specifica¬ tion) . The gain factor further declines to 45 percent of the 0° value at 20° horizontal divergence, and to 29 percent at 30° horizontal divergence. At the same time, the screen has a very narrow vertical distribution of light, with a gain factor at a vertical divergence angle of 5° of only 6 percent of its 0° value. The extremely narrow vertical distribution is a major drawback, since for viewers to see a projected image on sheeting with such a distribution would require that they be in a single row and all have the same eye level.
Prior to the commercial introduction of projection television, other attempts had been made to provide projec- tion screens that were brighter than lenticular or beaded screens, which typically exhibit gain factors of less than 5. Burton, U.S. Pat. 2,660,927, describes a screen made from a clear piece of transparent material such as glass, the back of which is formed with a sinusoidal pattern of closely spaced vertical ribs; the back ribbed surface of the glass is mirror-plated, and the front surface is

roughened sufficiently to remove glare. Disadvantages wit this screen include the fact that a surface of regular con figuration often produces scintillation, i.e., a flash of brilliant reflection from the screen seen at certain angle which disrupts viewing of a projected image, and glass is heavy and fragile.
Sherwood, U.S. Pat. 3,492,060, teaches a screen offered as an improvement over the Burton screen, and whic comprises a translucent sheet spaced in front of a reflec- tive rear sheet corrugated with alternate ridges and grooves. This screen also suffers from scintillation,’ nd in addition the spaced construction makes the product dif¬ ficult to manufacture and apply to a substrate.
Mihalakis, U.S. Pat. 2,984,152, and Mihalakis et al, U.S. Pat. 3,063,339, also describes screens having a regular pattern of curved reflective surfaces. In the ’15 patent, the reflective surfaces are vertical corrugations that undulate along their vertical length. The ‘339 paten teaches a more generalized surface designed to provide a desired field of observation; and a diffusing coating is applied over the configured surface. The ‘152 patent stat that screens as described can be manufactured by preparing by hand a larger-than-scale model, and then preparing an embossing master by copying the model in reduced scale “on a three dimensional engraving machine of conventional design employing the pantograph principle.” So far as known, no commercial sheeting of this type has ever appear and in any event the sheeting would presumably suffer from scintillation.
Disclosure of the Invention
The present invention provides a new sheeting, a durable long-lived projection screens made from the sheet- ing, which are capable of brightly reflecting images with good uniformity across a widely distributed audience. Briefly, this new sheeting comprises a transparent film
O

that is configured on its back surface with a random pattern of densely packed generally parallel elongated microscopic recesses or projections, which are concave or convex in both their longitudinal and transverse directions; and is con- figured on its front surface with densely packed light- refracting lenticular recesses or projections that spread light entering and leaving the front surface. A specularly reflective layer such as vapor-deposited aluminum is coated on the configured back surface, and a layer of adhesive is preferably disposed over the specularly reflective layer for adhering the sheeting to a backing or substrate.
The combination of reflecting and refracting recesses or projections produces a unique reflection and distribution of projected light. The sheeting is generally used with the elongated light-reflecting recesses or pro¬ jections oriented vertically, whereby these recesses or projections cause a horizontal spreading of light. The light-refracting recesses or projections on the front sur¬ face enhance this horizontal spreading and also achieve vertical spreading.
The random pattern of light-reflecting recesses or projections on the back surface of the film is prefer¬ ably provided as a positive or negative replicate of a stretched foamed film of the type described above, and the light-refracting recesses or projections on the front sur¬ face are also preferably a positive or negative replicate of such a stretched foamed film. Sheeting having such replicated front and back surfaces has greater numbers of light-refracting (front surface) and light-reflecting (back surface) recesses or projections across the horizontal axis than across the vertical axis, and the surfaces of the individual recesses or projections are more steeply inclined (.i.e., form a larger angle with respect to the plane of the sheeting) along the horizontal axis than along the vertical axis; and this greater number and steeper inclination of recesses or projections causes a preferential spreading of
OMPI

projected light in the horizontal direction upon initial entry of projected light rays into the film, upon reflecti at the back surface of the film, and upon departure of reflected rays from the film. Along with increased hori- zontal spreading of light, the light-refracting recesses or projections increase vertical spreading, which greatly enhances the utility of sheeting of the invention over tha possible with the metallized foamed polypropylene describe above. Sheeting of the invention can be tailored to pro vide different distributions of light as needed. However, even with the brightest expected projection television equipment, the screen should presumably exhibit a gain factor at a 0β divergence angle of at least 5, and more typically, gain factors of at least 10 or 15 at a 0° diver gence angle will be desired and can be achieved with sheet ing of the invention. To achieve good uniformity at hori¬ zontal viewing positions, the gain factors at angles of 10 20°, and 30° are typically at least 75 percent, 50 percent and 25 percent of the 0° value, and preferably are at leas about 85 percent, 60 percent, and 35 percent of the 0° value. Very importantly, good contrast between a projecte image and background is retained with screens of the inven tion even in the presence of overhead lighting, since such lighting tends to be reflected to the floor instead of to the audience. Also of importance for the most common present-day color projection televisions, screens made fro sheeting of the invention provide good color uniformity . across a horizontally distributed audience even when the image is projected by multiple side-by-side projection tubes for different colors. Also, the projected images on the screens tend to be free of scintillation and “hot spots.”
Sheeting of the invention is conveniently applie to a substrate, which is normally curved around only one axis, with the back surface of the transparent film that
O PI

carries the specularly reflecting layer being disposed toward the substrate. The transparent film thus overlies and protects the reflecting surface against abrasion, and screens made from sheeting of the invention are durable under all normal and expected handling conditions and may be washed as necessary.
While a primary use for sheeting of the invention is as a screen for projection television, the sheeting has other uses, such as a screen for movie or slide projectors; display screens for use in advertising displays (i.e., in which a slide transparency is projected at the screen) , optometry screens, etc. The optical properties of the screen may be varied for such uses. For example, a lower- gain screen may be desirable for home slid or movie pro- jectors.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 is a perspective view of a projection screen 10 comprising an illustrative sheeting of the inven¬ tion 11 adhered to a substrate 12. A projector 13, which may be a television projector, movie or slide projector, or the like, beams images to the screen, where they are re¬ flected to an audience. The substrate is slightly cylin- drically curved about a horizontal axis to vertically con¬ centrate or aim light rays reflected from the screen to the audience.
Figure 2 is a greatly enlarged edge view of the sheeting 11 and substrate 12. The sheeting 11 comprises a transparent film 14 configured on both the front surface 15 and back surface 16 with concave recesses 17′ and convex projections 17’ ‘ . The recesses and projections are elon¬ gated and generally parallel to one another, with their longitudinal axes extending perpendicular to the page of the drawings. A specularly reflective layer 18 is coated over the back surface 16, and a layer of adhesive 19 is coated over the specularly reflective layer and adheres the

sheeting to the substrate 12.
Representative paths for light rays projected at the sheeting 11 are diagrammed in Figure 2. Light rays 20 21, and 22 enter the film 14 at the surface 15, where they are refracted; then travel to the surface 16 and specularl reflective layer 18, where they are reflected; and then return to the front surface 15, where they are again re¬ fracted as they leave the film.
Figure 3 is a photograph enlarged 200 times over normal scale showing a perspective view of one-half of a representative film 14; the photographed film would be lam nated back-to-back with a similar or otherwise configured film to form the complete film 14. The white portion of t edge of the photographed film is a fracture line which was formed when the film was frozen and fractured to provide a edge for photographing.
Detailed Description
The configured surfaces of sheeting of the inven tion are preferably obtained by casting a liquid film- forming material onto a mold surface. Typically a moving mold surface such as a belt or drum is used. After castin the material solidifies, as by evaporation of solvent, coo ing, or reaction of reactive components, to take the confi uration of the mold surface. Alternatively, embossing techniques can be used, in which an embossing surface is pressed against a softene film. The film is then dried, cooled, or reacted to a solidified state. Combinations of casting and embossing techniques can also be used, as when a first configured surface is formed during casting of a film, and before the film has totally solidified a pattern of light-refracting recesses or projections is embossed into the opposite sur- face of the film.
Mold or embossing surfaces may be prepared in a variety of ways. As previously stated, a preferred method
OMP

is to use stretched foamed film as taught in Bottomley, U.S. Pat. 3,214,234. This film is prepared by extruding through an orifice a molten mixture of a normally solid polymer and a foaming agent. Cells or bubbles are formed in the film during extrusion. Upon subsequent stretching of the film, the outer cells appear as generally parallel elongated pro¬ jections in the exterior surface of the film. Some cells collapse during the stretching process to leave generally parallel elongated recesses in the film surface. Recesses are also formed adjacent or between projections. The foamed stretched film can itself be used as a mold surface, or electroform or silicone rubber positive or negative copies may be made from the film to form a more permanent casting or embossing surface. The film photographed in Figure 3 was obtained using a foamed and stretched film as a mold surface.
A different replicating surface may be prepared by forming a film with a dense pattern of spherical indents or protrusions and then stretching the film. A film with spherical protrusions can be formed by use of a mold pre¬ pared by pressing a beaded sheeting (such as reflective sheeting having a monolayer of microspheres partially embedded in the sheeting and partially protruding out of the sheeting) against a soft pliant shape-retaining flat- surfaced sheet or block. The beaded sheeting may be pressed against the sheet or block more than once, with the position of the beaded sheeting slightly changed between pressings. Such repeated pressings obtain a desired pack¬ ing, i.e., with the final recesses or projections contiguous so that essentially no flat surfaces are left from the ori¬ ginal flat surface of the sheet. An electroform copy can then be prepared from the resulting mold, or from assemblies of smaller sections of such a mold, and a film cast on this t mold. Another way to form a master is to mechanically indent a soft metal sheet, as by repeatedly impacting the
O PI

surface with peening wheels having bristles tipped with ha metal shot.
The film in the sheeting of the invention is mos often cast or embossed with the recesses or projections in their final shape. However, as indicated above, film can also be provided with a dense pattern of spherical recesse or projections, and then stretched to convert the recesses or projections to an elongated concave or convex shape.
The size and shape of the recesses or projection may be varied to obtain reflection properties appropriate to a particular use. Such variation may be obtained by using different degrees of elongation of a stretched foame film master or of cast films; by use of different bead siz when forming a pressed-bead master; etc. The recesses or projections will generally be microscopic in size, i.e., best viewed with a microscope, so that individual recesses or projections do not visibly stand out as a viewer looks at the screen.
The concavity or convexity of the recesses or projections is generally very gradual in the longitudinal direction, but contributes to the desirable spreading of light, especially to a vertical spreading of light. The longitudinal concavity or convexity follows from the gen¬ erally finite length of the recesses or projections (in comparison, for example, to the essentially infinitely lon striations of the screen described in the Schudel patent noted above, U.S. Pat. 4,089,587). For example, when the surfaces of preferred films cast on stretched foamed poly¬ propylene masters are measured on a Bendix Profilometer using a stylus having a radius of 500 microinches and a tracking weight of 250 milligrams, the ratio of peaks measured in the width direction to peaks measured in the length direction generally varies from 3:1 to 10:1, depend ing on the height of peaks that are regarded as “noise” (noise comprises peaks that are very small in height in comparison to the more significant peaks being measured.
O * – W

and the measuring instrument can be adjusted not to count them) . Insufficient readings are obtained from the Schudel sample in the longitudinal direction of the striations for calculating a meaningful ratio. The .ratio of peaks in the width and length direction for sheeting of the invention will be of a finite nature on the order of 25 to 1 or less. The recesses or projections need not be smoothly concave or convex, although preferred results are generally obtained when the surfaces of the recesses or projections are smooth. However, some imperfections can occur; for example, recesses produced by collapsed bubbles in a stretched foamed polymeric film can have a rough surface left by residue of the collapsed bubble wall. Some imper¬ fections of the surface, producing a scattering of light rays, can be useful to provide a “softer” image, i.e., an image which has minimal glitter caused by concentrations of imaging light rays from individual recesses or projections. Such a softer image can also be achieved by inclusion of light dispersants in the transparent film, e.g., minute transparent particles or liquid droplets dispered in the film.
The useful light-refracting recesses or projec¬ tions on the front surface of sheeting of the invention are characterized as lenticular; that is, the distribution of light from these recesses or projections is ordered rather than random. The needed order may be tested by metallizing a surface in question and measuring the gain factor from the surface. The useful surfaces generally provide a gain at 0° divergence of at least 2 and preferably at least 5 in such a test.
The need for ordered processing of light does not require that the light-refracting recesses or projections be of regular size or shape or be arranged in an ordered manner; to the contrary, a random pattern of refracting recesses or projections is preferred. The refracting recesses or projections can be of the same or different
O PI

shape and pattern as the reflecting recesses or projection Aside from refracting surfaces that replicate a stretched foamed polymeric film, best success has been obtained with surfaces that replicate the surface of a drum wound with a mono- or multi-filament wire.
As previously indicated, the transparent film in sheeting of the invention can be prepared by laminating tw separately prepared films together, by embossing both sur¬ faces of a single film, or by curing material cast between two mold surfaces. The transparent film may be thermo¬ plastic but often is preferably prepared from reactive com ponents which are reacted to a substantially infusible and insoluble state after configuration of the film. Reaction is preferably achieved by exposing the film-forming materia to radiation, e.g., heat, light, electron beam, etc., while the material is in liquid form on a mold surface. Useful film-forming materials include polyacrylates or meth- acrylates (preferably in reactive forms) , polyurethanes, polyesters, polycarbonates, polypropylene, and cellulose acetate butyrate.
The specularly reflective layer is conveniently applied by vapor-deposition, usually of a metallic material such as aluminum. An adhesive is usually coated over the specularly reflective layer for adhering the sheeting to a substrate. Pressure-sensitive adhesives are presently pre¬ ferred, although heat-activated or solvent-activated adhe¬ sives may also be used.
The invention will be further illustrated by the following example. A mixture comprising 69.7 weight-percen of an acrylate-terminated polyester-based urethane (Uvithan 893 by Thiokol), 29.8 weight-percent of tetraethylene glyco diacrylate, and 0.5 weight-percentc^,^-diethoxyacetophenone was prepared and cast with a knife-coater in a 0.09- millimeter thickness onto the surface of a stretched foamed polypropylene film as described in Bottomley, U.S. Pat. 3,214,234. The foamed film had been stretched lengthwise
OMP

five times its original dimension. The coated film was passed three times at a rate of 50 feet (15 meters) per minute under two 200-watt-per-square-inch ultraviolet lamps while under a nitrogen atmosphere in a unit supplied by Pittsburgh Plate Glass, Model QC 1202, whereupon the cast mixture reacted to a substantially infusible and insoluble state. The resulting cast film, when stripped from the foamed film and viewed under a microscope, had the general
• appearance of the film shown in Figure 3, with one face configured and the other smooth. A layer of pressure- sensitive acrylate adhesive was solution-coated on the smooth face of a length of the cast film and dried. The smooth face of another length of the film was then pressed against the adhesive to bond the two lengths of film to- gether. The two lengths of film were oriented so that the recesses and projections in each of the films were parallel to one another. The configured surface of one of the lami¬ nated films was then vapor-coated with aluminum, and a layer of pressure-sensitive acrylate adhesive was coated from solution over the specularly reflective layer with a knife- coater.
The reflective properties of the sheeting were measured and it was found that the film had a gain of 17 at 0° divergence, 15 at 10° horizontal divergence, 12.4 at 20° horizontal divergence, 9 at 30° horizontal divergence, and 2.5 at 5° vertical divergence.
Footnote
1 Gain factor is the ratio of the reflection from a screen under consideration and the reflection from a standard white diffusing surface under the same illumination. Gain factor is stated as the number of times that the screen is brighter than the standard white diffusing surface. The gain factors reported herein were measured on a goniophotometer made by Gardner Laboratory, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, Model No. GG 9204. With this instru-
-5UR£Λ
OMPI

ment, light is beamed at the screen being tested on a line that is horizontally spaced about 15° from a line perpendicular to the screen. Measurements are read wit a sensor placed on the side of the perpendicular line opposite from the projected beam. When the sensor is at a position horizontally spaced 15° on the side of the perpendicular line opposite from the projected beam (thus measuring the reflection at an angle equal and opposite to the angle of incidence) , the measurement is regarded as the reflection at a 0° divergence angle. This reading should be the peak reflection, since, as in specular reflection, the reflection is greatest when the angle of reflection is equal and opposite from the angle of incidence. When the sensor is positioned 25° on the side of the perpendicular line opposite from the projected beam, the reflection measured is regarded as the reflection at a 10° divergence angle; the 35° read¬ ing is the reflection at a 20° divergence angle; etc.
O

Claims (8)

Clai s

1. Sheeting useful as a projection screen comprising a transparent film configured on its front and back surfaces with microscopic recesses or projections, and coated on its back surface with a specularly reflective layer; characterized in that the recesses or projections on the back surface comprise a random pattern of generally parallel elongated recesses or projections that are concave or convex in both their longitudinal and transverse direc- tions, and the recesses or projections on the front surface are lenticular recesses or projections that spread light entering and leaving the front surface.

2. Sheeting of claim 1 in which the lenticular recesses or projections on the front surface are elongated in a direction generally parallel to the recesses or pro¬ jections on the back surface. –

3. Sheeting of claim 1 or 2 in which said pattern of recesses or projections on the back surface is a repli¬ cate of the surface formed by stretching a foamed polymeric sheet.

4. .Sheeting of claims 1, 2 or 3 in which the light-refracting recesses or projections on the front sur¬ face are substantially the same as the recesses or projec¬ tions on the back surface.

5. Sheeting of claims 1-4 which carries a layer of adhesive disposed over said specularly reflective layer for adhering the sheeting to a backing.

6. Sheeting of claims 1-5 which exhibits gain factors at 10°, 20°, and 30° divergence angles that are at least 85 percent, 60 percent, and 35 percent of the gain factor at 0° divergence.

7. Sheeting of claim 6 in which the gain factor at 0β divergence is at least 15.

8. A projection screen comprising sheeting of claim 1 adhered to a rigid substrate.

AU63371/80A
1979-09-05
1980-07-30
Projection screen

Ceased

AU530127B2
(en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number
Priority Date
Filing Date
Title

US072661

1979-09-05

US06/072,661

US4268118A
(en)

1979-09-05
1979-09-05
Sheeting useful as a projection screen

PCT/US1980/000974

WO1981000770A1
(en)

1979-09-05
1980-07-30
Sheeting useful as a projection screen

Publications (2)

Publication Number
Publication Date

AU6337180A

AU6337180A
(en)

1981-03-31

AU530127B2
true

AU530127B2
(en)

1983-06-30

Family
ID=26753607
Family Applications (1)

Application Number
Title
Priority Date
Filing Date

AU63371/80A
Ceased

AU530127B2
(en)

1979-09-05
1980-07-30
Projection screen

Country Status (1)

Country
Link

AU
(1)

AU530127B2
(en)

1980

1980-07-30
AU
AU63371/80A
patent/AU530127B2/en
not_active
Ceased

Contact information