AU631507B2 – Antifoam ingredient
– Google Patents
AU631507B2 – Antifoam ingredient
– Google Patents
Antifoam ingredient
Download PDF
Info
Publication number
AU631507B2
AU631507B2
AU86862/91A
AU8686291A
AU631507B2
AU 631507 B2
AU631507 B2
AU 631507B2
AU 86862/91 A
AU86862/91 A
AU 86862/91A
AU 8686291 A
AU8686291 A
AU 8686291A
AU 631507 B2
AU631507 B2
AU 631507B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
foam
particles
polymer
ingredient
weight
Prior art date
1990-10-31
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU86862/91A
Other versions
AU8686291A
(en
Inventor
William John Iley
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Unilever PLC
Original Assignee
Unilever PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
1990-10-31
Filing date
1991-10-29
Publication date
1992-11-26
1991-10-29
Application filed by Unilever PLC
filed
Critical
Unilever PLC
1992-05-07
Publication of AU8686291A
publication
Critical
patent/AU8686291A/en
1992-11-26
Application granted
granted
Critical
1992-11-26
Publication of AU631507B2
publication
Critical
patent/AU631507B2/en
2011-10-29
Anticipated expiration
legal-status
Critical
Status
Ceased
legal-status
Critical
Current
Links
Espacenet
Global Dossier
Discuss
Classifications
C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
C11D3/0005—Other compounding ingredients characterised by their effect
C11D3/0026—Low foaming or foam regulating compositions
B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
B01D—SEPARATION
B01D19/00—Degasification of liquids
B01D19/02—Foam dispersion or prevention
B01D19/04—Foam dispersion or prevention by addition of chemical substances
B01D19/0404—Foam dispersion or prevention by addition of chemical substances characterised by the nature of the chemical substance
C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
C11D17/00—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
C11D17/0039—Coated compositions or coated components in the compositions, (micro)capsules
C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
C11D3/16—Organic compounds
C11D3/37—Polymers
C11D3/3703—Macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
C11D3/373—Macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds containing silicones
C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
C11D3/16—Organic compounds
C11D3/37—Polymers
C11D3/3746—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
C11D3/3757—(Co)polymerised carboxylic acids, -anhydrides, -esters in solid and liquid compositions
C11D3/3761—(Co)polymerised carboxylic acids, -anhydrides, -esters in solid and liquid compositions in solid compositions
Description
nn~
AUSTRALIA
Patents Act 1990 a1507
ORIGINAL
COMPLETE SPECIFICATION STANDARD PATENT Invention Title: ANTIFOAM INGREDIENT.
The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me:- 44 4 4 4 4 4 4 4, 0 00 *0 00 40 O 0 0 0 40 000 0 0 0 000a 0000o .4 y C3 393 ANTI-FOAM INGREDIENT
I
I
*1
I
I
4 (4 4 46 4 4 444, 4 4~ 4 44 4 4, 0 4004 4 00 4 0 0 4, 00 440004 44,44 4, 04 44, 4 4048 4404 44400a 8 0 4444 0 0 4 44 0 40 4, 4 4 This invention relates to a particulate anti-foam ingredient which is suitable for incorporation into powdered detergent products.
Detergent products which comprises anionic surfactants or anionic and nonionic surfactant mixtures, and which are particularly suitable for fabric washing, generally have an inherent tendency to produce excessive foam during use.
This can be a problem particularly with drum-washing machines. It is accordingly usual to include an anti-foam agent in the detergent formulation to reduce or eliminate this tendency to produce excessive foam. Materials which are effective to control excessive foaming include certain hydrophobic oils such as hydrocarbons and silicone oil.
It is explained in the prior art, for example in EP-A-266863 (Unilever), that oily anti-foam active materials can migrate out of the carrier substance into the surrounding powder during storage and if this happens they are liable to become deactivated. Consequently, the prior art describes various expedients to diminish this migration of anti-foam active out of the particles which 15 C3393 2 C3393 initially contain it. For instance, EP-A-266863 (Unilever) discloses the superior retention of anti-foam active on an inorganic carrier which is a porous absorbent material comprising sodium carbonate.
We have found that there is a further problem related to migration of silicone oil anti-foam active out of anti-foam particles. This problem is that escaping silicone oil can cause incomplete dispensing when granular detergent compositions are used in automatic front-loading washing machines. A proportion of the powder which has been dosed into the dispenser of the machine is left behind in the dispenser at the point in w the machine’s operating cycle when the powder should be washed from the dispenser into the main drum of the machine.
0 However, we have observed that unsatisfactory dispensing behaviour tends to arise when a silicone oil anti-foam is incorporated into a detergent powder which, without the antifoam, disperses satisfactorily. This is so even when this silicone oil anti-foam is incorporated into a particulate ingredient. We believe that the difficulty arises from very tiny traces of silicone anti-foam which escape from the anti-foam particles and get to the i surface of the particles of the detergent composition.
We have found that this difficulty can arise when the amount of silicone oil escaping from the anti-foam particles is as little as 0.002% by weight based on the detergent composition as a whole. This will likely be only a fraction of one per cent of the quantity of anti-foam active which is present in the composition.
This is therefore a different problem from that addressed by the prior documents. In the prior documents the C3393 objective was to retain anti-foam active within the particles of an an 1 ti-foam ingredient so as to avoid deactivation of the anti-foam. From such a view point of seeking substantially to preserve anti-foam activity, the loss of only a fraction of a per cent of the anti-foam would be of no significance. However, so far as concerns achieving good dispensing, we have found that such tiny quantities have very considerable significance.
We have now found that dispensing can be improved by appropriate choice of coating on anti-foam particles.
Whether a coating is used to retain anti-foam active 4414 against deactivation, or is used for the more stringent requirement of preventing leakage of traces, there is an inherent problem. Any kind of coating on anti-foam active particles is called upon to perform two somewhat contradictory functions. Until the detergent composition 0 G containing the anti-foam ingredient comes into contact with wash water, the coating is required to retain anti-foam active within the particles of the anti-foam ingredient. However, when the particles come into contact with wash water, they are required to release the anti-foam active promptly. If the release is delayed the detergent composition could well foam excessively before release of the anti-foam.
The prior art has disclosed the use of wax as a coating material for anti-foam particles, for example EP-A-71481 (Unilever) discloses anti-foam particles having a core of gelatinised starch with silicone anti-foam absorbed thereon and a coating of paraffin wax at the exterior of the particles. EP-A-206522 (Unilever) is a further example of anti-foam particles with an outer, wax coating. However, wax coatings do not dissolve Tlcr~~ ~1 i
I’
i I
I
I
t tt i r i 4 particularly well in normal wash conditions and therefore do not release sufficient anti-foam.
EP 301 412 (Henkel) discloses pourable, free-flowing antifoam additive granules containing silicone anti-foam and a high foaming anionic surfactant on a cellulose-based substrate. The granules may be treated with preferably below 10 wt% (more preferably below 7 wt%) alkali-soluble or dispersible polymer.
Summary of the Invention Accordingly, the present invention provides a particulate anti-foam ingredient comprising a liquid polysiloxane antifoam active absorbed by particles of solid carrier, 15 characterised in that the particles are coated particulate with from 7 to 15% by weight of the coated anti-foam ingredient of an organic polymer soluble in aqueous alkaline solution, which is a polymer of one or more olefinically unsaturated monomers containing an acidic S 20 group.
t 4 1 The various constituents of an ingredient as defined above will now be discusse& by turn.
The solid carrier A variety of materials can be used as a solid carrier for an anti-foam active. Materials disclosed by prior documents as being suitable carriers include gelatinised starch, zeolite, hydrophobic silica, sodium perborate tetrahydrate or monohydrate and other water-soluble salts such as sodium tripolyphosphate and sodium sulphate. A number of such materials are referred to in EP-A-206522 (Unilever).
t r 5 C3393 It may be preferred that the carrier material is inorganic, since inorganic carrier materials tend to have superior mechanical strength. An inorganic carrier material may be crystalline or amorphous (e.g.
crystalline sodium carbonate, crystalline zeolite, amorphous zeolite).
Especially, it is pr rred that the carrier particles are a water-soluble inorganic carrier of the type referred to in EP-A-266863 (Unilever). The carriers of that application are especially effective for absorbing and retaining oily anti-foam active substances. They are defined as being porous absorbent materials comprising sodium carbonate and having a mean particle diameter not exceeding 2,000 pm, preferably 250-1500 pm, even more preferably 700 Am; a pore volume of from 0.2 to 3 Scm /g and a median pore diameter not greater than 20 m.
i .One example of such a material is light soda ash.
Further example are crystal-growth-modified sodium carbonate monohydrate, crystal-growth-modified Burkite (double salt of sodium carbonate and sodium sulphate) and crystal-growth-modified sodium sesquicar- These I materials are described in more detail in EP-A-266863 *.(Unilever) and the crystal-growth-modified carbonate salts are described’ and claimed in EP-A-221776 (Unilever).
Anti-foam active The anti-foam active to which this invention relates must comprise a silicone oil, either alone or jointly with another antifoam active such as a hydrocarbon oil or a wax petroleum jelly).
-6 C3393 Silicone oils are polysiloxanes. Those which can be employed as anti-foam actives have the structure:
R
SiO
I
ARl
I
il 4
R
x I where R and R are the same or different alkyl or aryl i groups having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms and x is an i integer of at least The preferred polysiloxanes are polydimethylsiloxanes, where both R and R are methyl groups.
I The polysiloxanes usually have a molecular weight of from 500 to 200,000 and are generally non-volatile, in that !i 2 they have a kinematic viscosity of from 50mm nn 2 s to 6 2 2 x 10 mm s. Preferably, the polysiloxanes have 2 4 2 kinematic viscosity of from 5 x 10 to 5 x 10 mm s, most 3 4 2 preferably from 3 x 10 to 3 x 10 mm s at 25°C. The S polysiloxane is generally end blocked with trimethylsilyl groups, but other end-blocking groups are also suitable.
Examples of suitable commercially available polysiloxanes are the polydimethyl siloxanes, “Silicone 200 Fluids” available from Dow Corning, having viscosities of from 4 2 to 5 x 10 mm 2s.
For convenience the term “silicone oil” is used herein to denote liquid polysiloxane.
7- C3393 Other anti-foam active materials may be included in the particulate ingredient of the present invention. Such materials may be anti-foam actives in their own right or may be anti-foam promoters which serve to enhance the activity of another anti-foam active. Further anti-foam materials include fatty esters of natural or synthetic origin, for instance beeswax, carnauba wax, spermaceti, and synthetic fatty esters of C 16
-C
22 fatty acids.
Examples of anti-foam promoters include hydrophobic silica and the alkali phosphates and alkali nitrogen compounds which are discussed in EP-A-266863 (Unilever).
I Silicone oil is virtually invariably used in conjunction j with hydrophobic silica particles.
Ii Polymer coating The polymer which is used as a coating material in this invention needs to be soluble in aqueous alkaline solution so that it will dissolve when it comes into contact with the alkaline wash liquor formed by dissolution of the other constituents of a granular detergent composition. Thus it should be soluble in aqueous solution of pH 10 or greater. Preferably it is soluble in aqueous solution of pH 8.5 or greater.
i Solubility in neutral or even acidic aqueous solution is possible within the scope of this invention provided that solubility is also apparent under alkaline conditions.
The solubility at pH 8.5 may be greater than the solubility at pH 7. This may be beneficial because it can be expected that, in use, the water entering the dispenser of a washing machine will be neutral or even slightly acidic, and will become alkaline as the I_ __i
L
8 C3393 detergent composition dissolves. If the solubility of the polymer coating is greater at alkaline pH than at neutral pH, then the coating of the anti-foam particles can be expected to dissolve slightly after the remainder of the composition.
The polymer is preferably a polymer of one or more olefinically unsaturated monomers. More preferably one or more monomers contain acidic groups, which are most likely to be carboxylic acid groups. The presence of such groups confers solubility under alkaline conditions.
Thus more particularly, the polymer may be a homopolymer or copolymer of acrylic, methacrylic or ethacrylic acid.
Such monomers may be copolymeri.-:d with other monomers in which ionisable acid groups are not present. Examples of I, o such other monomers include acrylate and methacrylic esters such as N-butyl acrylate. Further examples are o styrene and vinylacetate.
One example of a suitable coating polymer is an alkali soluble latex whose constituent monomers, as percentages by weight are: o 0 Sstyrene G. N-butyl acrylate methacrylic acid 4 Such a latex is available from National Starch under S their designation P.P.E. 1061.
Further examples of alkali soluble latices are the “Eudragit” (trade mark) range available from Rohm and Haas, for example Eudragit S12.5 (trade mark) and Eudragit S100 (trade mark) which are copolymers of methacrylic acid and methyl methacrylate.
9- C3393 The polymer coating is from 7 to 15% by weight of the coated anti-foam particles (corresponding to a coating thickness of 15 to 55 gm) and the amount of polymer used to form a coating layer on the anti-foam ingredient j particles is chosen so as to provide adequate encapsulation of the oily anti-foam within the particles and yet not delay release of the anti-foam unduly. An optimum amount of the polymer coating will depend to some extent on the constituent of the polymer used to provide the coating. The optimum amount can be determined by ii experiment, making and testing trial quantities of I anti-foam ingredient in the manner described in the examples which follow.
0.6 IApplication of the polymer coating is preferably carried out in a fluidised bed, as described in EP-A-54174 t (Unilever) the disclosure of which is incorporated herein S4 by reference. For this procedure a polymer latex is o_ introduced into a fluidised bed of the particles to be coated, while the bed is maintained at a temperature which is at least as great as a value 10 0 C less than the glass transition temperature of the polymer. The bed temperature may be higher than the glass transition S temperature, but preferably is not more than 200C above 444 it.
For such a coating process it is preferred that the polymer has a glass transition temperature in a range 4, 4 from 30 0 C to 80 0
C.
Other coating techniques may be employed. One possibility is to use the Accela Cota which is a side vented drum machine made by Manesty Machines Ltd and usually used for coating tablets in the pharmaceutical industry.
~;~i;uurmv~~ 10 C3393 Additional coating The effectiveness of an alkali-soluble polymer coating may be further enhanced by providing an additional coating either beneath or on top of the polyner coating.
Thus for example a silicate film coating could possibly be applied to the particles before coating with the synthetic polymer required for the present inventl3n.
Another expedient would be to coat the particles with the alkali-soluble polymer in accordance with the present invention and subsequently apply an exterior coating of water soluble material such as polyethylene glycol.
o Any additional coating may constitute 0 to 15% of the 0 00 particles.
S00 Preferred proportions of components o o The total amount of anti-foam active material (active substance plus optional promoter) which is carried by the porous inorganic carrier is preferably from 4 to more preferably from 10 to 40% and most preferably from 12 to 35% by weight of the total anti-foam ingredient.
The carrier preferably forms from 35 to 91%, more preferably from 45 to 90% and most preferably from 50 to by weight of the total anti-foam ingredient.
If both anti-foam active substance(s) and promoter are present the anti-foam active substance(s) can form from 1 to 99% by weight and the anti-foam promoter(s) can form from 99 to 1% by weight of the total anti-foam substance carried by the porous carrier. Preferably the anti-foam active substance constitutes from 75 to 90% of the total anti-foam material present, the balance being promoter.
11 C3393 It is preferred that polysiloxane constitutes 35 to 100% of the anti-foam active(s) present and 30 to 90% of total anti-foam material including promoter. Thus the amount of polysiloxane is preferably 1.5 to 50% by weight, more preferably 3 to 40% of the anti-foam ingredient.
Process of preparation The production of carrier particles with absorbed anti-foam actives can be carried out in accordance with the techniques described in the prior art, for instance as detailed in the examples of EP-A-266863 (Unilever), EP-A-206522 (Unilever) and EP-A-71481 (Unilever) already o °o referred to.
e o0 0o To obtain a good coating film on such particles, it is S00 preferred that the particles are spherical and 0000 o non-porous. Particles may be rendered spherical and °O their porosity reduced or eliminated by procedures for the 1purpose such as described by Rowe in Pharmacy International, May 1985, pages 119-123.
Detergent composition 0a 0 0 It is envisaged that the coated particles constituting o 0 the particulate anti-foam ingredient according to this °0 invention will be incorporated in a granular detergent composition. Such a composition can comprise from 0.1 to 0 o preferably from 0.2 to 3% and most preferably from 0 0.5 to 2% by weight of the anti-foam ingredient.
Detergent compositions as envisaged will generally contain one or more detergent-active compounds and one or more detergency builders. They will generally also contain one or more other conventional detergent -12- C3393 ingredients, for example bleaching materials, enzymes, anti-redeposition agents and fluorescers.
Suitable detergent active compounds are well known in the art and can be chosen from soap and non-soap anionic, cationic, nonionic, amphoteric or zwitterionic detergent active compounds and mixtures thereof. Many suitable detergent-active compounds are commercially available and are fully described in the literature, for example in “Surface Active Agents and Detergents” Volumes I and II by Schwartz, Perry and Berch.
The detergent-active compounds which can be used are soaps and synthetic non-soap anionic and nonionic compounds. Mixtures of detergent-active compounds, for example mixed anionic or mixed anionic and nonionic 00 compounds are preferably used in the detergent 0 compositions.
The detergent active component of the detergent powder composition will generally comprise from 5 to preferably from 8 to 30% by weight of the composition.
a0 Detergency builders are materials which function to 000404soften hard water by solubilisation or other removal of 44t4 calcium and to a lesser extent magnesium salts responsible for water hardness. Detergency builders can ‘%toobe soluble inorganic compounds, especially exemplified by sodium tripolyphosphate. A further water soluble inorganic builder compound is sodium carbonate which is generally used in conjunction with a seed crystal to accelerate the precipitation of calcium carbonate.
Common insoluble inorganic detergency builders are ion exchange compounds notably aluminos silicates. organic detergency builders such as sodium citrate and e cm~ l ~I 13 C3393 polyacrylate can also be used. The detergency builder component of a detergent composition will generally comprise from 1 to 90%, preferably from 5 to 75% by weight of the detergent composition.
Bleaching materials include peroxy bleach compounds such as inorganic persalts and organic peracids. Sodium perborate is preferred as organic persalt. Persalts, especially perborates may be used in conjunction with a bleach activator. Bleaching material, if present, will generally comprise from 1 to 30% preferably from 5 to by weight of a detergent composition.
Other ingredients which are customary included in a detergent composition, although not necessarily all S” together, include alkaline silicate, soil release agents, anti-redeposition agents such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, enzymes, fabric softening agents, fluorescent brightners and filler such as sodium sulphate.
A detergent composition to be used with the anti-foam ingredients for the present invention should form an alkaline wash liquor when it dissolves. The level of J alkalinity can be in accordance with conventional practice, in accordance with which a detergent composition is required to be alkaline, but not too strongly alkaline as this could result in fabric damage I ,v 0 and also be hazardous for domestic use. In practice the 4 w 4 compositions should preferably provide a pH of from to 11 in use in the aqueous wash liquor. It is preferred in particular for domestic products to yield a pH of from to 10.5, as lower pH values tend to be less effective for optimum detergency and more highly alkaline products can be hazardous if misused. The pH is measured at the lowest normal usage concentration of 0.1% w/v of the -14 C3393 product in water of 12 0 H (Ca) (French permanent hardness, calcium only) at 50 0 C so that a satisfactory degree of alkalinity can be assured in use at all normal product concentrations.
EXAMPLES
Example 1 Anti-foam particles were prepared in accordance with EP-A-266863 (Unilever). The composition of these anti-foam particles was: weight% 4 0 44.,Light soda ash 76.0 Silicone oil 13.5 :Alkyl phosphate Petroleum jelly 7.2 U 0 I The particles were of 0.7mm average diameter and were passed through a sieve to exclude any oversized particles.
V These particles were spheronized using a rotating plate in a vertical cylinder as described in Pharmacy International, May 1985, pages 119-123. The resulting spherical particles were then film coated with an alkali soluble latex having the composition referred to above that is to say: Styrene 10 weight N-butyl acrylate 60 weight Methacrylic acid 30 weight% i C3393 This polymer had a glass transition temperature of 40 0
C
and dissolves in aqueous solutions having pH 8.2 or above. The amount of polymer coating was arranged to be 8% by weight based on the uncoated particles (approx.
by weight of the coated particles).
The polymer coating was applied by the technique described in EP-A-292314 (Unilever) using a Glatt fluidised bed coating apparatus (Glatt Equipment Corporation). The polymer latex was sprayed in by the Wurster spray method, described in US 3253944 (D E Wurster; Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation), and referred to in EP-A-292314 (Unilever). The bed temperature was maintained at 420C which was close to the glass transition temperature of the polymer.
o”o A detergent base powder prepared by spray drying followed S^ by adding certain ingredients had the following 0 composition: i 16 C3393 Spray-dried by weight Sodium alkyl benzene sulphonate 8.3 Ethoxylated fatty alcohol (average 7EO) Zeolite 23.3 Maleic/acrylic copolymer Sodium carboxymethylcellulose Sodium carbonate Minor ingredients 0.9 Water 10.00 Added subsequently Sodium carbonate 3.00 “o.s Ethoxylated fatty alcohol (average 3EO) 4.21 o o Zeolite S, Sodium perborate monohydrate 16.3 o a0 oo Tetraacetylethylene diamine Water and minor ingredients balance to 100% The coated particles were added to the samples of the 0 base powder in a weight ratio of coated particles base powder 1 10. The resulting mixtures were placed in polyethylene bags and shaken intensively for one minute.
As a comparison anti-foam particles which had not been coated with the polymer were also mixed into samples of ti, the detergent powder in a quantity calculated to give the same amount of anti-foam active in the final mixture.
The dispensing of these samples from a washing machine was tested using a dispenser drawer as fitted to a Phillips (trade mark) AWB126 washing machine. A 200g dose of powder is placed in the main compartment of the drawer and tap water at 10°C and 120 French Hardness is raP~s~ 17 C3393 allowed to flow through at a rate of 5 litre/min for two minutes. At the end of this period the flow is stopped, excess water is poured off, the residual mass of wet powder is weighed and the weight is expressed as a percentage of the dry powder initially placed in the dispenser drawer. The test was carried out twice and the results are as follows: Per cent wet residues Base Powder Base Powder Plus Base Powder coated particles plus uncoated S.0 particles O: 9.0 29.7 102 o°11.2 39.3 102 o It can readily be seen that coating of the anti-foam particles has greatly improved dispensing as compared with uncoated particles.
0 0Example 2 :0 o Anti-foam particles were prepared as in example 1, then a coated with the same polymer latex in an amount which was by weight of the uncoated particles.
0o’iO The coated particles were added to samples of the same o base powder as used in example 1. The amounts added were 4.9% based on the detergent composition so that the composition eventually contained 0.6% silicone oil. The compositions were mixed for 15 minutes in a mechanical mixer both to give thorough mixing and to simulate the mechanical damage to particles when could be expected during machine processing, transport and storage.
if2-~s~ 18 C3393 Samples of the resulting mixtures were subjected to a dispensing test generally as described in example i.
However, the wet residues left in the dispenser drawer were dried in an over to constant weight. This dry weight is then expressed as a percentage of the dry powder initially placed in the dispenser drawer. The results of three tests were: Percent dry residues Base powder Base powder plus Base powder coated particles plus uncoated particles
