GB1568659A - Creation of Inventions and Patents with Artificial Intelligence

GB1568659A – Process for producing 4-methyl-1-pentene copolymer composition
– Google Patents

GB1568659A – Process for producing 4-methyl-1-pentene copolymer composition
– Google Patents
Process for producing 4-methyl-1-pentene copolymer composition

Download PDF
Info

Publication number
GB1568659A

GB1568659A
GB1729478A
GB1729478A
GB1568659A
GB 1568659 A
GB1568659 A
GB 1568659A
GB 1729478 A
GB1729478 A
GB 1729478A
GB 1729478 A
GB1729478 A
GB 1729478A
GB 1568659 A
GB1568659 A
GB 1568659A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
copolymer
pentene
methyl
weight
polymer
Prior art date
1978-05-02
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)

Expired

Application number
GB1729478A
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)

Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd

Original Assignee
Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
1978-05-02
Filing date
1978-05-02
Publication date
1980-06-04

1978-05-02
Application filed by Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd
filed
Critical
Mitsui Petrochemical Industries Ltd

1978-05-02
Priority to GB1729478A
priority
Critical
patent/GB1568659A/en

1980-06-04
Publication of GB1568659A
publication
Critical
patent/GB1568659A/en

Status
Expired
legal-status
Critical
Current

Links

Espacenet

Global Dossier

Discuss

Classifications

C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY

C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON

C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS

C08F210/00—Copolymers of unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbons having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond

C08F210/14—Monomers containing five or more carbon atoms

Description

(54) PROCESS FOR PRODUCING 4-METHYL-1-PENTENE
COPOLYMER COMPOSITION
(71) We, MITSUI PETROCHEMI
CAL INDUSTRIES LTD., a Japanese Body
Corporate, of 25, 3-chome, Kasumigaseki,
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, do hereby declare the invention, for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement:- This invention relates to a process for producing a 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene copolymer composition by an industrially easy operation with a good quality reproducibility, which can lead to the improvement of the impact strength of the copolymer of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene without substantially deteriorating its desirable properties such as light weight and transparency and which can eliminate the trouble of whitening and delamination at the time of bending or impact.
4 – Methyl – 1 – pentene polymers have satisfactory light weight and transparency, but because of their insufficient impact strength, their use has been limited in many ways.
Japanese Patent Publication No. 22077/75
(corresponding to British Patent No.
1,001,801) discloses a solid transparent Co- polymer of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene with a minor proportion of a linear 1-olefin having from 5 to 18 carbon atom which has a high clarity and a low haze and is optically superior, and also a process for its production. This Patent Publication states that to prepare the transparent copolymer with the highest possible clarity and the lowest possible haze, by the process of this Publication comprising copolymerizing the 4 – methyl – 1pentene and the linear 1-olefin in the presence of a stereospecific catalyst, two things are essential: that a high proportion of the catalyst residues should be removed from the polymer produced, and that the polymer should not be allowed ro come into contact with water until the catalyst removal process is at an end. It is stated also in this patent publication that the copolymer is meant to include products of both random and sequential polymerizations, and that such sequential copolymerization may be carried out by polymerizing 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene while passing in the second monomer for one or more controlled periods, such periods being at spaced intervals.
This patent publication refers to sequential copolymerization as well as random copolymerization, but all of the Examples cover random copolymerization, and sequential copolymerization is not shown at all. Furthermore, the patent publication contemplates the improvement of the optical properties of the copolymer, and no specific suggestion is made as to the improvement of impact strength.
In fact, scarcely any improvement in impact strength is observed in a random copolymer of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene and a linear 1olefin having more than 5 carbon atoms as compared with a homopolymer of 4 – methyl1 – pentene.
Another suggestion is made in British Patent
No. 1,093,344. This Patent discloses a process which comprises initially copolymerizing a branched chain 1-olefin such as 4 – methyl1 – pentene with a linear 1-olefin such as 1hexene to form a first living polymer (which means a polymer the chains of which are still capable of growth), and subsequently polymerizing further branched chain 1-olefin such as 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene to form a block
copolymer, both polymerization stages being
effected in the presence of a catalyst such as
titanium trichloride and diethylaluminum
chloride.
This patent states that in general the above
copolymer possesses higher impact strength,
greater flexibility and, in many cases, lower
brittle point than a homopolymer of the
branched chain 1-olefin, and it is recom
mended that the polymerization be carried
out in a hydrocarbon liquid medium such as
heptane.
According to this process, a rubbery co
polymer of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene and 1
hexene for example is first formed, and 4
methyl-1-pentene is further polymerized in
the presence of the reaction product contain
ing the above copolymer. When the rubbery
copolymer is formed in the first stage, a greater portion of this copolymer dissolves in the reaction medium. Thus, if only the slurry component is recovered after the polymerization, the impact strength of the resulting polymer is scarcely improved. A copolymer composition having improved impact strength can only be obtained by recovering both the polymer insoluble in the reaction medium and the polymer soluble in the reaction medium and combining them. However, since a greater portion of the rubbery copolymer dissolves in the solvent, the viscosity of the polymer solution inconveniently increases to make the polymerization operation difficult. Hence, the aforesaid recovery process is complicated and is economically disadvantageous. In addition, shaped articles prepared from such a copolymer cannot be free from whiteing or delamination.
As still another suggestion, British Patent
No. 1,095,303 discloses a composition comprising a minor proportion of a rubbery copolymer of 4 – methyl – 1 – penten and a linear 1-olefin with a view to increasing the impact strength of a homopolymer of 4methyl – 1 – pentene without substantially sacrificing its tensile strength and transparency.
Such a blend is unsuitable for providing a homogeneous composition with a good reproducibility of quality, and cannot easily afford a homogeneous composition such as a product of sequential polymerization. Furthermore, shaped articles prepared from such a blend cannot be free from the trouble of whitening.
The present inventors have made investigations in an attempt to provide a 4 – methyl1 – pentene copolymer composition which is free from the disadvantages of the prior art techniques mentioned above and has improved impact strength without a substantial deterioration in the desirable properties of poly 4methyl – 1 – pentene such as light weight and transparency and which also overcomes the trouble of whitening and delamination at the time of bending or impact associated with the prior art techniques.
These investigations have led to the discovery that a 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene copolymer composition having light weight, transparency, high-impact strength, resistance to whitening and resistance to delamination can be provided by an easy operation with a good reproducibility of quality by a process which comprises [Ij a step of forming a reaction product containing (A) poly 4methyl – 1 – pentene or a copolymer of 4methyl – 1 – pentene with a minor amount of a Ce-C,8 linear 1-olefin with a 4 – methyl1 – pentene content of at least 90% by weight, and [II] a sequential copolymerizing step of further copolymerizising 4 – methyl – 1pentene, 1-hexene and a C7-C10 linear 1olefin in the presence of the reaction product in the previous step to form (B) a rubbery copolymer containing these three monomers in amounts of 30 to 70% by weight, 10% to 60% by weight, and 10 to 60% by weight respectively, the proportion of the rubber copolymer (B) being 5 to 20% by weight based on the combined weight of (A) and (B).
In step [I] of the present invention, 4methyl – 1 – pentene is polymerized in the presence or absence of a minor amount of a C6418 linear 1-olefin to form a reaction product which contains (A) a polymer or copolymer of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene with a 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene content of at least 90% by weight. The reaction is carried out in a hydrocarbon liquid medium in the presence of a catalyst composed of a transition metal compound and an organometallic compound of a metal of Groups I to II of the periodic table.
A stereospecific catalyst of the above combination can be used in the present invention. Suitable transition metal compounds include, for example, titanium halide compounds having the general formula TiXs (X is a halogen atom) or
1
TiX3 . @ 3 such as TiC or TiQ9 . — AICla 3 which is obtained by reducing titanium tetrachloride with a member selected from hydrogen, aluminum, titanium and organoaluminum compounds. Complexes at least containing titanium, magnesium and halogen, for example, a titanium halide supported on a halogen-containing magnesium compound, can also be used.
The preparation of these catalysts is known, and for example, highly active catalysts comprising the latter-mentioned complexes at least containing titanium, magnesium and halogen are disclosed in detail in, for example,
Japanese Patent Publication No. 36786/77 (published on September 17, 1977), Japanese
Patent Publication No. 36913/77 (published on September 17, 1977), Japanese Laid-Open
Patent Publication No. 126590/75 (laid open on October 4, 1975), Japanese Laid-Open
Patent Publication No. 28189/76 (laid-open on March 9, 1976), Japanese Laid-Open
Patent Publication No. 92885/76 (laid open on August 14, 1976), Japanese Laid-Open
Patent Publication No. 127185/76 (laid open on November 5, 1976), Japanese Laid
Open Patent Publication No. 136625/76 (November 26, 1976), Japanese Laid-Open
Patent Publication No. 87489/77 (laid open on July 21, 1977), West German Patent Pub lication No. 2643143 (laid open on June 2, 1977), West German Patent Publication No. 2656055 (laid open on June 23,
1977), and West German Patent Publication
No. 2708588 (laid open on September 8,
1977). Preferably, such catalysts have a specified surface area of at least 100 m2/g. hen complexes containing at least titanium, magnesium and halogen are used as the uan- sition metal compound, it is preferred to use an electron donor conjointly. Examples of the electron donor are organic acid esters such as aromatic carboxylic acid esters, alkyl-containing ethers, and organic acid anhydrides.
The electron donor is effectively used by ineluding a part or the whole of the electron donor in the complex at least containing titanium, magnesium and halogen, and the remainder is added to the polymerization system; or by contacting it with the organo metallic compound in advance.
Suitable organometallic compounds are organoaluminum compounds, preferably alkylaluminum compounds of the general formula . AlXn in which R is an alkyl group, X is a hydrogen or halogen atom, and n is 0 to 2. Specific examples of the alkylaluminum compounds include trialkyl aluminums, dialkylaluminum halides, alkylaluminum sesquihalides and di alkylaluminum hydrides in which the alkyl groups have 1 to 10 carbon atoms. Chlorine, bromine and iodine are examples of the halogen in the above halides.
The reaction is carried out in a hydrocarbon liquid medium. Preferred liquid media are those in which at least 90% by weight of a homo or copolymer having a 4 – methyl – 1pentane content is insoluble. Specific examples are aliphatic hydrocarbons such as hexane, heptane, octane, decane and kerosene. 4
Methyl – 1 – pentene may be used in excess to make it serve also as such a liquid medium.
In the step [I3 of this invention, a homo- or copolymer having a 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene content of at least 90% by weight is formed, and by utilizing the liquid medium mentioned above, the polymerization or copolymerization can be performed in slurry. Thus, the undesirable increase of the viscosity of the reaction system can be prevented, and the polymerization operation and the separation of the final 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene copolymer composition can be effected easily.
The CGK18 linear 1-olefin which may be included in an amount of up to 10% in the 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene copolymer obtained in step [Ij includes, for example, 1-hexene, 1-octene, 1 decent, and 1-hexadecene.
The 4-methyl-1-pentene content of the copolymer formed in step [I] is at least 90% by weight, preferably at least 94% by weight.
Preferably, the polymer or copolymer obtained in step [I] has an intrinsic viscosity (measured at in 135″C in decalin) of 0.5 to 15, especially 1 to 7. To control the intrinsic viscosity of the polymer or copolymer, polymerization may be performed in the presence of a molecular weight control agent, preferably hydrogen.
Polymerization can be performed by means ordinarily used for polymerizing or copolymerizing olefins with Ziegler-type catalysts.
It is carried out in the absence of a substantial amount of moisture and oxygen, for example in a nitrogen atmosphere. To perform stable slurry polymerization, the reaction temperature is for example, 0 to 1500C, preferably 30 to 100″C, and the polymerization pressure is atmospheric to 20 kg/cm2, preferably atmospheric to 10 kg/cm2.
To control the stereospecificity or molecular weight of the polymer or copolymer produced, the reaction may be carried out in the further presence of a C1-C13 alcohol such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol, pentanol, hexanol, octanol or benzyl alcohol, a C2C1s ester such as methyl formate, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, vinyl acetate, ethyl chloroacetate, ethyl acrylate, ethyl benzoate and methyl ptoluate, a -C1, ketone such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, acetophenone and benzophenone, and a C2- C20 ether such as methyl ether, ethyl ether, n-butyl ether, tetrahydrofuran, anisole and diphenyl ether.
The amount of the catalyst used can be freely chosen. For example, the amount of the transition metal compound is 0.001 to 100 millimoles as metal atom, and the amount of the organometallic compound is 0.1 to 500 millimoles as metal atom, per liter of the hydrocarbon liquid medium. The mole ratio of the metal of the organo-metallic compound/the metal of the transition metal compound is preferably 0.1 to 100, more preferably 1 to 10.
In step [11] of the present invention, copolymerization is carried out in the presence of the reaction product containing the polymer or copolymer of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene produced in step [I].
The polymerization in accordance with this invention can be performed batchwise or continuously. In the batch process, the reactor is first charged with a solvent, catalyst and hydrogen. Then, predetermined amounts of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene and a C0-C10 linear 1-olefin are fed either at a time or continuously and polymerized for a predetermined period of time. Subsequently, predetermined amounts of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene, 1-hexene and a C,-C10 linear 1-olefin are introduced, and polymerized for a predetermined period of time. The polymerization is then stopped by adding an alcohol, for example. In the continuous process, a solvent, a catalyst, hydrogen and a first monomer are continuously fed into a first reactor, and the polymerization reaction mixture is continuously transferred into a second reactor. A second monomer is continuously fed into the second reactor, and the polymerization reaction mixture in the second reactor is continuously transferred into a catalyst decomposing tank.
The polymerization in step [II] results in a rubbery copolymer (B) having a 4 – methyl1 – pentene content of 30 to 70% by weight, a 1-hexene content of 10 to 60% by weight5 and a C,–C,,, linear 1-olefin content of 10 to 60% by weight. In step [II], the three monomers are copolymerized in the presence of the rigid resin of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene polymer or copolymer (A) formed in step
[I] thereby to form the rubbery copolymer (B).
Copolymerization in step [II] can be performed at the same temperatures and pressures as exemplified with regard to step [I]. Within the ranges illustrated for step [Ij, the same or different temperature and pressure conditions can be chosen. Following step [I], the slurry state is preferably retained in step [II] also. Better results are obtained in step [II] by not using hydrogen that can be used in step [Il.
The copolymer composition thus obtained by the process of this invention comprising steps [I] and [II] has an intrinsic viscosity (measured at 1350C in decalin) of 0.5 to 15, more preferably 1 to 7.
In the sequential copolymerization in steps [I] and [II] of this invention, the reaction can be performed under slurry polymerization or copolymerization conditions, and this can avoid an undesirable increase in the viscosity of the reaction mixture. The final product can therefore be obtained in the form of a slurry.
The catalyst is deactivated in a customary manner by adding an alcohol such as methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol or isobutanol, and then the solid 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene copolymer composition can be separated and recovered by using known solid-liquid separating procedures such as centrifugal separation.
It is not necessary at all to resort to a complicated and disadvantageous procedure of recovering the soluble polymer or copolymer that may be contained in the liquid phase, and combining it with the solid polymer so as to achieve improved impact strength.
The amount of the rubbery copolymer (B) formed in step [II] is 5 to 20% by weight based on the total weight of the polymer or copolymer (A) formed in step [I] and the rubbery copolymer (B). If this amount is larger than the specified limit, the resulting copolymer composition has very poor light transmittance, haze and resistance to whitening. If it is less than the specified limit, desired impact strength cannot be obtained. Accordingly, the reaction in step II] must be performed so as to provide the above-specified amounts.
C7-C10 linear 1-olefins having 7 to 10 carbon atoms for use in step [II] are 1heptene, 1-octene, l-nonene and 1-decene.
The 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene copolymer composition used obtained by the process of this invention substantially retains the light weight and transparency of poly 4 – methyl1 – pentene and has improved impact strength and also superior resistances to whitening and to delamination which cannot be achieved by the prior art techniques. The improved copolymer composition of this invention, because of these improved characteristics, can find extensive use in the preparation of shaped articles such as impact-resistant transparent containers and bottles, impact-resistant transparent pipes and films for high temperature sterilization.
The copolymer compositions that can be provided by the process of this invention have a melting point of 200 to 2400 C, an intrinsic viscosity, measured at 1350C in decalin, of 0.5 to 15, a haze of 1.0 to 5.0%, a stress at yield point of 150 to 300 kg/cm2, an impact strength, determined by a rod falling test at 50C, of at least 100 kg/cm2, and a whitening resistance of at least 6 mm.
The following examples illustrate the process of the invention in more detail.
The properties of the 4 – methyl – 1pentene copolymer compositions are determined by the following methods.
(1) Content of the rubbery copolymer (B).
At the end of step [I], a part of the polymerization reaction mixture is collected, and the concentration of the polymer is measured to calculate the amount of the polymer formed at the end of step [I]). The value obtained is
subtracted from the concentration of the final
copolymer composition formed, and the result is defined as the content of the rubbery co
polymer.
(2) Composition of the rubbery copolymer
(B).
The proportion of the comonomer in the polymer or copolymer at the end of polymerization in step [I] and step [II] is measured by C13-NMR, and the composition of the rubbery copolymer is calculated in accordance with the following equation.
[Ml o – [MiA XA [M]. = | – ( /0 by weight)
Xg XA: the weight fraction of component
(A).
Xg: the weight fraction of component
(B).
M: comonomer (e.g., 1-hexene). rM]0: the proportion of the comonomer in
in the entire copolymer composition.
[M] the proportion of comonomer M in component (A).
[M1B: the proportion of comonomer M in
component (B).
(3) Intrinsic viscosity
Measured in decalin at 1350C.
(4) Stress at yield point
ASTM D638-68.
(5) Izod impact strength
ASTM D256.
(6) Impact strength by a rod falling test.
A molded plate with a thickness of 2 mm is maintained at a predetermined temperature, and a rod of a given load having a tip with a curvature of radius of 5 mm is let fall onto the center of the molded plate from a height of 70 cm. The load is varied, and the impact energy value on the verge of 50% breakage of the molded plate is measured, and defined as the impact strength.
(7) Haze
ASTM D1746-62T.
(8) Resistance to whitening.
A 3 mm thick molded plate is bended at a speed of 100 mm/min. using a device designated in ASTM D790-66. The moving distance of the loading nose which causes whitening in the molded plate is measured, and defiped as resistance to whitening.
(9) Resistance to delamination.
A IV-type dumbbell sample in accordance with ASTM D638-68 is injection-molded.
The test sample is bended, and visually evaluated.
Example 1.
A 3-liter polymerization reactor was fully dried, and a nitrogen gas was passed to evacuate the air in it. The reactor was then charged with 1.5 liters of n-decane as a solvent, 13.3 millimoles of titanium trichloride and 26.6 millimoles of diethylaluminum chloride as a catalyst and 1.2 liters of hydrogen. The mixture was stirred, and maintained at 500C. 500 g of 4 – methyl – 1pentene was fed into the reactor maintained at 500C over the course of 90 minutes. The polymerization was continued for 4 hours.
Then, a mixture of 37.5 g of 4 – methyl – 1pentene, 31.3 g of l-hexene and 31.3 g of 1-decene was fed at a time, and the polymerization was continued at 500C for 4 hours.
Then, 90 ml of isobutanol was added to stop the polymerization. The resulting slurry was stirred at 500C for 15 minutes. The copolymer was separated by filtration in a nntrogen atmosphere, and mixed with stirring with 1.2 liters of n-decane containing 5% by volume of isobutanol at 50″C for 30 minutes, followed by filtration. This operation was repeated four times, and the product was dried to separate 510 g of a white powdery copolymer.
The content of the rubbery copolymer (B) was 13% by weight. The copolymer (B) contained 32.6% by weight of 1-hexene and 20.7% by weight of 1-decene.
To the resulting powdery copolymer were added 0.12% by weight of tetrakis[methylene3 – (3′,5″ – di – t – butyl – 4′ – hydroxyphenyl)propionate]methane, 0.05% by weight of 2,6 – di – t – butyl – p – cresol and 0.03% by weight of calcium stearate. The mixture was pelletized at 2800 C, and then injectionmolded at 2800 C. The properties of the injection-molded articles were determined, and the results are shown in Table 1.
Examples 2 to 4 and Comparative
Examples 1 to 4.
The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that the first and second monomers were changed as shown in Table 1. The properties of the resulting copolymers are shown in Table 1.
Example 5.
The procedure of Example 1 was repeated except that as a catalyst, 0.1 millimole, as titanium, of a catalyst component prepared by the method described below, and 3 millimoles of triethyl aluminum were used together with 1 millimole of methyl p-toluate.
Preparation of the titanium
catalyst component.
Anhydrous magnesium chloride (20 g), 4.6 ml of ethyl benzoate and 3.0 ml of methylpolysiloxane (having a viscosity of 20 centipoises at 250C) were charged in an atmosphere of nitrogen into a stainless steel (SUS -32) ball mill cylinder having an inner capacity of 800 ml and an inside diameter of 100 mm and containing 2.8 kg of stainless steel (SUS-32) balls with a diameter of 15 mm. They were contacted with one another for 100 hours at an impact acceleration of 7.8 g. Ten grams of the resulting solid treated product was suspended in 100 ml of titanium tetrachloride, and the suspension was stirred at 800C for 2 hours. The solid ingredient was collected by filtration, and washed with purified hexane until no free titanium tetrachloride was detected in the wash liquid. The washed product was dried to afford a complex containing titanium, magnesium and halogen.
This complex contained 2.0% by weight of titanium, 66.0% by weight of chlorine and 6.5% by weight of ethyl benzoate and had a surface area of 200 m2/g.
Comparative Example 5.
A fully dried, nitrogen-purged polymeriza tion reactor (5 liters in capacity) was charged with 1.5 liters of n-decane as a solvent and 13.3 millimoles of titanium trichloride and 26.6 millimoles of diethylaluminum chloride as a catalyst. The mixture was stirred and maintained at 500 C. A mixture of 37.5 g of 1-decane was fed at a time, and the polymerization was performed at 50″C for 4 hours.
Since the polymerization reaction mixture became very viscous to make its stirring difficult, 1.5 litres of n-decane was further added.
Then, 1.2 liters of hydrogen was fed at a time, and 500 g of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene was fed into the polymerization reactor kept at 500C over the course of 90 minutes. Then, the polymerization was continued for 4 hours.
Then, 90 ml of isobutanol was added to stop the polymerization. The reaction mixture was worked up in the same way as in Example 2 to afford a copolymer. The properties of the copolymer are shown in Table 1.
Comparative Example 6.
In the procedure of Example 1, the firststep polymerization and the second-step polymerization were performed separately. The rubbery component (B) was frozen and pulverized, and mixed with the powdery polymer component (A) at a (B):(A) weight ratio of 10:90. The mixture was pelletized in a pelletizer (20 m+), and molded into a press sheet. The properties of the press sheet are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Proportion of the rubbery component (B) Intrinsic viscosity in the of the Comonomer in step [I] Comonomer in step [II] copolymer composition compolymer composition (wt. %) (wt. %) (wt. %) (#) Example 1 – 1-hexene (31), 1-decene (31) 13 2.50 2 1-hexene (3) ” ” 12 2.57 3 1-decene (6) ” ” 12 2.64 4 1-hexene (6) 1-hexene (31), 1-octene (16), 1-decene (16) 11 2.53 5 – 1-hexene (31), 1-decene (31) 10 2.71 Comparative Example 1 1-hexene (6) 1-hexene (62) 12 2.70 2 1-octene (6) 1-octene (62) 12 2.69 3 1-decene (6) 1-decene (62) 11 2.55 4 1-octadecene (6) 1-octadecene (62) 10 2.63 5 1-hexene (31) – – 2.53 1-decene (31) 6 – 1-hexene (31), 1-decene (31) 10* 2.56 * The proportion of the rubbery component in the mixture.
TABLE 1 (Continued)

Stress at Izod impact Rod falling impact Resistance Resistance yield point strength strength to whitening to (kg/cm) (kg.cm/cm) (kg.cm/cm) Haze (mm) delamination 23 C notched 23 C 5 C (%) 23 C Example 1 260 2.7 300 1.3 8 No 2 230 2.8 350 1.5 9 ” 3 210 3.0 420 1.6 10 ” 4 215 2.9 420 1.7 10 ” 5 250 2.6 350 1.4 9 ” Comparative Example 1 215 2.0 less than 10 Example 7.
A 200-liter polymerization reactor was fully dried, and purged with nitrogen to expel the air. The reactor was then charged with 90 liters of n-decane as a solvent, 0.80 mole of titanium trichioride and 1.60 moles of diethylaluminum chloride as a catalyst, and 72 liters of hydrogen. The mixture was stirred, and maintained at 50″C. A mixture of 28.2 kg of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene, 0.6 kg of 1-hexene, 0.6 kg of 1-octene and 0.6 kg of 1-decene was fed into the polymerization reactor at 500C over the course of 90 minutes. The polymerization was continued for 4 hours.
One cubic meter of nitrogen was passed at 500C through the vapor phase of the reactor over the course of 15 minutes, and a mixture of 2.25 kg of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene, 1.25 kg of 1-hexene, 1.25 kg of 1-octene and 1.25 kg of 1-decene was fed at a time. The polymerization was continued at 50″C for 4 hours.
Then, 5.4 liters of isobutanol was added to stop the reaction. The resulting slurry was stirred at 500C for 15 minutes, and the resulting copolymer was separated by filtration in nitrogen. The copolymer separated was mixed with stirring with 72 litres of n-decane containing 5% by volume of isobutanol at 500C for 30 minutes, followed by filtration. The operation was repeated four times to separate a white powdery copolymer. The component (B) of the copolymer contained 25.0% by weight of 1-hexene, 12.3% by weight of 1octene and 10.9% by weight of 1-decene.
To the resulting powdery copolymer were added 0.12% by weight of tetrakis
[methylene – 3 – (3′,5′ – di – tert – butyl4′ – hydroxyphenyl)propionate] methane, 0.05% by weight of 2,6 – di – tert – butylp – cresol, and 0.03% by weight of calcium stearate. The mixture was pelletized at 280″C, and injection-molded or blow-molded. The properties of the molded articles are shown in Table 2.
The blow-molded bottles were 400 ml. cylindrical bottles with a diameter of 56 mm and a height from the bottom to the shoulder of 150 mm, and had a unit weight of 30 g.
The blow molding was performed by using a spider die while maintaining the resin temperature at 2800C and the die temperature at 300″C.
Comparative Examples 7 to 10.
The procedure of Example 7 was repeated except that only 1-decene was used as a comonomer to be mixed with 4 – methyl – 1pentene (Comparative Example 7) in steps [1] and [II]; 1-hexene was used as the first comonomer and l-octene was used as the second comonomer (Comparative Example 8); a mixture of 97% by weight of 4-methyl1 – pentene and 3% by weight of 1-decene was polymerized in the first step using the same solvent and catalyst (Comparative
Example 9); or a mixture of 90% by weight of 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene and 10% by weight of 1-hexene was polymerized in the first step using the same solvent and catalyst (Comparative Example 10).
The results are also shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 7 Example 7 Example 8 Example 9 Example 10 1st step polymerization wt. % of 4-methyl-1- pentene 94 97 94 97 90 Comonomers l-hexene 1-decene 1-hexene 1-decene 1-hexene l-octene 1-decene 2nd step polymerization wt. % of 4-methyl-1- pentene 37.5 37.5 37.5 – Comonomers l-hexene 1-decene l-octene 1-octene 1-decene 1st monomer /2nd monomer feed ratio 100/20 100/20 100 /20 100/0 100/0 Yield (kg) of powder 30.5 31.6 30.2 28.7 24.6 Total comonomer amount (wt. Xc) 12.5 9.2 12.3 3.0 8.0 Rubbery portion (B) Content (wt. %) 13.6 12.6 13.0 – – Comonomer proportion (wt. %) | 48.2 | 46.0 | 51.2 | – | Melt index of powder (5 kg, 2600 C) 4.56 10.6 5.7 4.6 5.0 Intrinsic viscosity of the powder (in decalin at 1350C) 2.71 2.50 2.68 2.69 2.67 Melt index of pellets (5 kg, 2600C) 8.1 12.0 10.3 6.8 6.0 Stress at yield point (kg’cm2) 201 227 205 260 200 Izod impact strength (notched, 230 C) (kg.cm/cm2) 3.3 2.9 2.3 2.0 2.0 TABLE 2 (Continued)
Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 7 Example 7 Example 8 Example 9 Example 10 Rod-falling impact strength (kg.cm/cm) at 230C 420 420 420 less than 10 30 at 50C 260 280 40 less than 10 ess than 10 Resistance to whitening* 10 3 8 15 17 Blow-molded bottles Falling strength (m) ** at 230C 4.1 4.5 4.0 0.2 0.2 at 50C 1.3 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Appearance Good Roughened Roughened Good Good *: Same as in Table 1.
**: A 400 ml blow-molded bottle was filled with water to the full, and let fall with-its
bottom down. The height which resulted in the breakage of five bottles out of ten
was measured, and defined as the falling strength.

Claims (7)

WHAT WE CLAIM IS:

1. A process for producing a 4 – methyl1 – pentene copolymer composition by sequential polymerization, which comprises
[I] a step of polymerizing 4 – methyl – 1pentene in the presence or absence of a minor amount of a C8C18 linear l-olefin in a hydrocarbon liquid medium in the presence of a catalyst comprising a transition metal compound and an organometallic compound of a metal of Groups I to III of the periodic table to form reaction product containing a 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene polymer or copolymer (A) having a 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene content of at least 90% by weight; and
[II] a step of further copolymerizing 4methyl – 1 – pentene, 1-hexene and a C, Clo linear 1-olefin in the presence of the reaction product containing the polymer or copolymer (A) to form a rubbery copolymer (B) having a 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene content of 30 to 70% by weight, a 1-hexene content of 10 to 60 and a C,0 linear 1-olefin content of 10 to 60% by weight, the content of the copolymer (B) being 5 to 20% by weight based on the combined weight of the polymer or copolymer (A) and the copolymer (B).

2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the polymer or copolymer (A) formed in step [I] has an intrinsic viscosity, as measured in decalin at 135″C, of 0.5 to 15, and the 4methyl – 1 – pentene copolymer composition formed by the combination of steps [I] and
[II] has an intrinsic viscosity, measured in decalin at 1350C, of 0.5 to 15.

3. A process according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the transition metal compound used as a catalyst ingredient is a titanium compound, and the organometallic compound used as a catalyst ingredient is an organoaluminum compound.

4. A process according to claim 1, 2 or 3 wherein the reactions in steps [I] and [11] are carried out at a temperature of 00C to 1500C and a pressure of atmospheric pressure to 20 kg/cm2.

5. A process according to claim 1 substantially as described in any one of the Examples.

6. A 4 – methyl – 1 – pentene copolymer composition when produced by a process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims.

7. Shaped articles prepared using a composition as claimed in claim 6.

GB1729478A
1978-05-02
1978-05-02
Process for producing 4-methyl-1-pentene copolymer composition

Expired

GB1568659A
(en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number
Priority Date
Filing Date
Title

GB1729478A

GB1568659A
(en)

1978-05-02
1978-05-02
Process for producing 4-methyl-1-pentene copolymer composition

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number
Priority Date
Filing Date
Title

GB1729478A

GB1568659A
(en)

1978-05-02
1978-05-02
Process for producing 4-methyl-1-pentene copolymer composition

Publications (1)

Publication Number
Publication Date

GB1568659A
true

GB1568659A
(en)

1980-06-04

Family
ID=10092666
Family Applications (1)

Application Number
Title
Priority Date
Filing Date

GB1729478A
Expired

GB1568659A
(en)

1978-05-02
1978-05-02
Process for producing 4-methyl-1-pentene copolymer composition

Country Status (1)

Country
Link

GB
(1)

GB1568659A
(en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party

Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title

EP0253625A1
(en)

1986-07-14
1988-01-20
Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd.
Branched alpha-olefin polymer composition and process for its production

EP0260037A1
(en)

1986-09-04
1988-03-16
Sumitomo Chemical Company, Limited
Catalytic copolymerisation of 4-methylpentene

1978

1978-05-02
GB
GB1729478A
patent/GB1568659A/en
not_active
Expired

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party

Publication number
Priority date
Publication date
Assignee
Title

EP0253625A1
(en)

1986-07-14
1988-01-20
Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd.
Branched alpha-olefin polymer composition and process for its production

US4798866A
(en)

1986-07-14
1989-01-17
Mitsui Petrochemical Industries, Ltd.
Branched alpha-olefin polymer composition and process for its production

EP0260037A1
(en)

1986-09-04
1988-03-16
Sumitomo Chemical Company, Limited
Catalytic copolymerisation of 4-methylpentene

US4801650A
(en)

1986-09-04
1989-01-31
Sumimoto Chemical Co., Ltd.
Process for producing 4-methylpentene-1 copolymer and resin composition containing the same

Contact information